Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About usOur organizationAdministrative organizationConsultationUniversity Council

106, March 2016

11 April 2016

Appointment advisory committee CUOS

On behalf of the University Council Anne van der Wolff, Teunis Dokter and Michelle Hartmans were nominated for the appointment advisory committee of CUOS.

Advancement of women into higher academic positions

Extensive discussion was held about the policy on women moving up to higher academic positions. The Board has appointed two Chief Diversity Officers to increase the percentage of female U(H)D's and professors. The accompanying report was the basis for an open discussion.

Several Council members pointed to the fact that diversity can only really increase if the possibilities for following the tenure track route in part-time is facilitated much better. Lijst Sterk and other Council members voiced their fundamental disapproval of positive discrimination measures and indicated that the percentage of female employees is also low in other employment groups.

Evaluation Tenure Track

The Tenure Track policy of the RUG was evaluated by means of a series of meetings with Faculty Boards and other persons in management layers. (The meetings with tenure track employees themselves had already taken place at an earlier stage.)

The Council once again pointed to a number of well-known sticking points around the Tenure Track system. The Personnel Faction pleaded for a reduction in the length of the temporary appointment from six to four years; however, this is not adopted by the Board.

Bursary system

There were still a number of questions about the paragraph on the proposal for bursaries (scholarship students), such as the height of the scholarship (at least € 1700 nett/month). After the Board clarified this issue the Council agreed to this proposal.

Internal apportionment and allocation model

The Board has clarified, by means of two presentations during the committee meeting, how the money of the university is allocated to the faculties. How the so-called 'start value' (representing about half of the faculty budgets) is made up is still unclear. According to the Council this is an obscure hotchpotch of individual measures. The Council, once again, insisted on, in spite of the lack of clarity, wanting to see a further specification.

Last modified:28 April 2016 4.40 p.m.
printView this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 11 July 2019

    Major companies’ annual reports too vague about climate impact

    Many major Dutch companies publish extensive information about climate impact in their annual reports. However, very few companies provide concrete, detailed information about their own CO2 emissions, the impact of climate change on their business...

  • 08 July 2019

    UG permanently closes Yantai project

    The University of Groningen (UG) has permanently closed the project aimed at creating a branch campus in Yantai. Discussions were held with China Agricultural University, the city of Yantai and the Province of Shandong.

  • 03 July 2019

    Cheap train tickets boost public transport use but reduce customer satisfaction

    Offers of cheap single train tickets through retailers such as Kruidvat or Etos have a positive impact on the number of kilometres travelled by rail. This impact is much bigger than that of more general TV, newspaper or magazine advertising. However,...