Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
Over ons Actueel Nieuws Nieuwsberichten

Internal colloquium - April 26 - Menno Rol (University of Groningen)

15 februari 2012

April 26, 2012, 13:00-14:15, B136 Gadourekzaal:
Menno Rol (University of Groningen): Warranting the use of causal claims: a non-trivial case for interdisciplinarity

To what use can causal claims established in good studies be put? We give examples of studies from which inaccurate inferences were made about target policy situations. The usual diagnosis is that the studies in question lack external validity, which means that the same results do not hold in the target as in study. That’s a label that just repeats what we already knew. We offer a deeper analysis. Our analysis points to the need for interdisciplinarity and to the demand to focus not on the study – as the expression ‘external validity’ invites you to do – but on the target.

The call for interdisciplinary approaches to real life problems is common since it is widely acknowledged that what happens in the real world seldom falls under the auspices of any single research domain. Our focus is on one specific real life problem: how to use causal claims from good studies to help predict whether the policies tested will work in a new situation. Our analysis of what it takes to back up these predictions points up very specific stages in the process of prediction where we are bound to get it wrong if we do not diversify our concepts, our knowledge and our methods. We isolate two reasons inferences from study to target fail. First, policy variables do not produce results on their own; they need helping factors. The distribution of helping factors is likely to be unique or local for each study, so one cannot expect external validity to be all that common. Second, researchers often give too concrete a description of the cause in the study for it to carry over to the target. Abstraction is necessary to get causes that travel.
There is no sure-fire way to guard against these problems. But the unavailability of one perfect tool does not imply there are no second best contrivances. Two general pointers for Good Practice in policy advice follow from our diagnosis: focus on the concrete details in the target and use cross discipline heuristics that diversify background knowledge.

Laatst gewijzigd:20 juni 2024 08:18

Meer nieuws

  • 10 september 2024

    Steeds weer de verkeerde

    Julie Karsten onderzoekt hoe ervaringen met seksueel grensoverschrijdend gedrag de online partnerkeuze van jongeren beïnvloeden. Ze richt zich vooral op de vraag of mensen die eerder ‘dader’ of ‘slachtoffer’ zijn geweest elkaar opzoeken. Door deze...

  • 09 september 2024

    Mensen met psychose vaak slachtoffer van geweld

    Mensen met een psychose worden veel vaker slachtoffer van geweld en criminaliteit dan de algemene bevolking. Dit blijkt uit het promotieonderzoek van Bertine de Vries, dat zij op 19 september verdedigt aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

  • 04 september 2024

    Segregatie op de werkvloer groeit: Topverdieners werken steeds meer samen

    Topverdieners werken steeds vaker uitsluitend samen met andere hoogbetaalde collega’s, terwijl het contact met werknemers met een middeninkomen verder afneemt.