On Wednesday 16 February, the Information Science department of the University of Groningen will be organizing a symposium about Watson, IBM’s supercomputer. That evening, the computer will be competing in the quiz show Jeopardy! in the United States against Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter, the two best human players ever.
If the trial round is a good predictor of the result, then Watson will be the winner. This would be an enormous leap forward in computer development and human-machine communication. It would surpass the achievement of the IBM computer Deep Blue, which beat the reigning chess world champion Kasparov in 1997.
The Information Science department of the University of Groningen is specialized in the automatic analysis of human language, and is itself busy developing a question-answer system (like Watson) for Dutch. The University of Groningen offers both Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Information Science (Dutch-taught).
Watson will be playing against human opponents on 14, 15 and 16 February. The contests will be broadcast live in the United States. On 16 February, three experts at the University of Groningen will explain what is going on at the event. They will use video fragments from the first two rounds to answer questions, including the following:
The audience and the press will also have the opportunity to ask questions.
Chairman: Theo Jurriens
Wednesday 16 February 2011, 6-7 p.m., Harmonie Building, Oude Kijk in 't Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK Groningen, Room 14.14.
Note for the pressContact: Prof. Johan Bos
During the Second World War, more Jewish residents of five municipalities in the province of Groningen were killed than previously had been estimated. This is the conclusion of research conducted by Richard Paping, a historian at the University of...
Dr Donya Ahmadi, assistant professor of International Relations at the Faculty of Arts, researches and documents the role of female activists in the political developments of 20th and 21st-century Iran.
Classic mythological stories have been written in a certain Zeitgeist and from a specific, often male, perspective. But how would these stories sound if we looked at them through a current lens, and from a female perspective?
The UG website uses functional and anonymous analytics cookies. Please answer the question of whether or not you want to accept other cookies (such as tracking cookies).
If no choice is made, only basic cookies will be stored. More information