The war against drugs is changing, slowly but surely. This is the conclusion reached by Michelle Bruijn in her PhD research. Countries are resigned to the limitations of the criminal law system and are now looking for other ways of tackling drug-related crime. Bruijn will be awarded a PhD by the University of Groningen on 20 May 2021.
Many researchers claim that the criminal law system is ineffective in its attempts to tackle drug abuse and drug-related crime. They conclude that the war against drugs has failed. But Michelle Bruijn has drawn a different conclusion after studying the regulation of cannabis in Canada and the Netherlands, the closure of drug houses in the Netherlands and home evictions because of drug-related crime in the Netherlands and the United States of America.
The criminal law system restricts the government in its ability to tackle drug-related crime. One of the reasons is that the protection afforded to citizens under criminal law has made the procedures too lengthy. ‘In addition, the strategy of the criminal law path does not appear to be working,’ says Bruijn. Bruijn explains how some countries have found other avenues. Some of them, including Canada, have liberalized or legalized the use, possession, sale and production of cannabis. The Dutch government has pursued a non-enforcement policy regarding the sale of cannabis in coffee shops for decades, and is about to start an experiment with the regulated growing of cannabis.
Bruijn: ‘The UN drugs conventions, which ban the legalization of cannabis, no longer seem to form an obstacle.’ Until now, both Canada and the Netherlands have been criticized internationally for their liberal cannabis policies, but there have been no actual repercussions. Bruijn: ‘Current developments show that the governments in both countries have little difficulty waiving the international conventions.’
Another way of getting around the limitations of criminal law is to deploy administrative and private law instead. In this way, drugs producers do not only face legal sanctions, but may also lose their homes through closure or eviction. ‘The main advantage of this approach is that administrative and private law provide far fewer public safeguards than criminal law,’ explains Bruijn. ‘An appeal for the right to a fair trial or the right to housing provides little legal protection in cases involving closures and evictions.’
Bruijn concludes that whereas the approach to the ‘war on drugs’ used to be based purely on criminal law, it is now also based on administrative and civil law. This has eroded the boundaries between the various fields of law, and has had an adverse effect on the legal protection of citizens. ‘Both the right to a fair trial and the right to housing have been seriously compromised. Legal protection has not yet been amended to cover this alternative war on drugs.’
Blocking motorways, protesting against abortion, and waving torches outside a politician’s home. The right to demonstrate is of great importance, but sometimes causes friction with other human rights. For her PhD research, Noor Swart is looking...
The remarkable progress in artificial intelligence (AI) is transcending boundaries and finding invaluable applications across diverse academic disciplines. Recognizing the transformative potential of AI, we are proud to introduce the new theme,...
Adriaan J. Wierenga, emergency law specialist, argues in favour of a thorough revision and simplification of the national emergency law before the next crisis arrives. Proper legislation could save lives.
The UG website uses functional and anonymous analytics cookies. Please answer the question of whether you want to accept
or reject other cookies (such as tracking cookies).
If no choice is made, only basic cookies will be stored. More information