Municipal redivision is not saving any money
The Dutch Cabinet is aiming to save a billion euros per year via municipal redivision. However, even in the smallest municipalities redivision will not result in lower expenses, nor in better municipal facilities. Municipal redivision for financial reasons is therefore pointless, according to Maarten Allers and Bieuwe Geertsema of COELO in today's issue of the journal ESB. COELO (the Centre for Research on Local Government Economics) is a research institute linked to the University of Groningen.
COELO compared the expenses per inhabitant in the period 2002-2013 in a number of redivided municipalities with a number that had not been redivided, controlling for population growth, population density and numerous other factors. It turned out that the municipal expenses did not increase any less or more in redivided municipalities than in municipalities that had not been redivided – neither shortly before or during the redivision nor in the long term afterwards.
More information
Contact: Maarten Allers
See also this Unifocus video about COELO:
| Last modified: | 17 September 2021 2.22 p.m. |
More news
-
11 March 2025
East Groningen: universal basic services must be up to standard
Sjierdan Koster makes the case for long-term thinking and for bringing Groningen’s universal basic services up to standard.
-
05 March 2025
Women in Science
The UG celebrates International Women’s Day with a special photo series: Women in Science.
-
11 February 2025
Verbeelding in Verandering - hoe om te gaan met verandering en te komen tot een inclusiever gesprek over het platteland van morgen
Het Nederlands landelijk gebied staat voor een groot aantal ruimtelijke opgaven, bijvoorbeeld op het gebied van klimaat, waterkwaliteit, agrarisch landgebruik en leefbaarheid in dorpen. Hoe de benodigde transities gezamenlijk vorm te geven is een...