Luca Nanetti - Strange materials, curious methods: Information loops in the brain
19 februari 2013
There is little doubt that information flows in the nervous system. Imagine: the skin of our arm comes to close, sudden touch with something sharp; specific sensors register the event; an electric signal is carried by wires (axons) across relay stations (synapses); a motor response is generated; the arm is quickly withdrawn. Or maybe not … if the sharp object is a needle, attached to a syringe, and the whole is operated by a physician, we don’t move. What’s different in the information flow? A sharp needle, a cold surface, a gentle caress, all activate different sensors, and different circuits where information flows.
A more complex scenario is represented by the management of a situation of equilibrium, or, better, if and when a situation of equilibrium must be either kept, or broken. The very act of physical ‘standing’ involves a delicate balance of antagonist muscles; when we want to take a step that balance needs to be broken. A similar scenario presents in decision making. The Italian folklore reports a starving donkey who cannot choose between two equivalent heaps of hay; amusing and paradoxical how it sounds, one can wonder about how much different is actually our behaviour when we spend way too much time hesitating between, say, two different bottles of olive oil at the supermarket: in both cases the protagonist’s well-being depends from disrupting an equilibrium.
The central nervous system provides wonderfully flexible mechanisms to cope with the problematic situations depicted above; the outlines of the main pathways of information flows will be illustrated in the first part of the Colloquium, also using elements of embryology. A short introduction to how the ‘hardware’ wiring of the central nervous system is investigated will close the first section.
The second part will focus on an important brain subsystem: the basal ganglia. This group of structures is responsible for a number of both ‘logical’ and ‘physical’ subsystems, from skeletomotor management (the ‘standing up’ mentioned above), to decision making (the donkey dilemma), to emotion regulation, to … a lot more. Receive and classify information; wait for an equilibrium to be broken by either the reaching of a critical mass, or by the arrival of crucial information; take a decision in terms of ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ advice to other brain structures. This is the crucial role played by basal ganglia.
The last part of the Colloquium will be about an advanced technique, borrowed from econometrics, called ‘Granger Causality’, which potentially can show the direction of the information flow, and consequently which brain structures ‘rule’ the behavior of other parts depending on the cogent situation.
A more complex scenario is represented by the management of a situation of equilibrium, or, better, if and when a situation of equilibrium must be either kept, or broken. The very act of physical ‘standing’ involves a delicate balance of antagonist muscles; when we want to take a step that balance needs to be broken. A similar scenario presents in decision making. The Italian folklore reports a starving donkey who cannot choose between two equivalent heaps of hay; amusing and paradoxical how it sounds, one can wonder about how much different is actually our behaviour when we spend way too much time hesitating between, say, two different bottles of olive oil at the supermarket: in both cases the protagonist’s well-being depends from disrupting an equilibrium.
The central nervous system provides wonderfully flexible mechanisms to cope with the problematic situations depicted above; the outlines of the main pathways of information flows will be illustrated in the first part of the Colloquium, also using elements of embryology. A short introduction to how the ‘hardware’ wiring of the central nervous system is investigated will close the first section.
The second part will focus on an important brain subsystem: the basal ganglia. This group of structures is responsible for a number of both ‘logical’ and ‘physical’ subsystems, from skeletomotor management (the ‘standing up’ mentioned above), to decision making (the donkey dilemma), to emotion regulation, to … a lot more. Receive and classify information; wait for an equilibrium to be broken by either the reaching of a critical mass, or by the arrival of crucial information; take a decision in terms of ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ advice to other brain structures. This is the crucial role played by basal ganglia.
The last part of the Colloquium will be about an advanced technique, borrowed from econometrics, called ‘Granger Causality’, which potentially can show the direction of the information flow, and consequently which brain structures ‘rule’ the behavior of other parts depending on the cogent situation.
| Laatst gewijzigd: | 13 juni 2019 13:40 |
Meer nieuws
-
16 april 2024
RUG ondertekent Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information
De Rijksuniversiteit Groningen heeft de Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information (Verklaring Open Onderzoeksinformatie) officieel ondertekend. Dit wordt gezien als een grote stap richting verantwoordelijke onderzoeksbeoordeling en open...
-
02 april 2024
Vliegen op houtstof
In Makers van de RUG belichten we elke twee weken een onderzoeker die iets concreets heeft ontwikkeld: van zelfgemaakte meetapparatuur voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek tot kleine of grote producten die ons dagelijks leven kunnen veranderen. Zo...
-
18 maart 2024
VentureLab North helpt onderzoekers op weg naar succesvolle startups
Het is menig onderzoeker al overkomen. Tijdens het werken vraag je je opeens af: zou dit niet ontzettend nuttig zijn voor de mensen buiten mijn onderzoeksveld? Er zijn allerlei manieren om onderzoeksinzichten te verspreiden. Denk bijvoorbeeld aan...