Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface
PhD ceremony: Ms. K. Beijering, 14.30 uur, Academiegebouw, Broerstraat 5, Groningen
Dissertation: Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface
Promotor(s): prof. M. Norde, prof. J. Hoeksema
Faculty: Arts
Karin Beijering’s dissertation investigates the rise of epistemic expressions in relation to different types of language change, viz. lexicalization, grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. Four case studies from the domain of epistemic modality in the Mainland Scandinavian languages are discussed. These epistemic phenomena pose problems for traditional analyses within the framework of grammaticalization studies, because they are at the interface of (most current definitions of) grammaticalization, lexicalization and pragmaticalization.
Beijering presents a novel model of analysis and a unified account of language change centered on the notion of a composite change. A composite change is composed of formal reanalysis and semantic reinterpretation, accompanying primitive changes at different linguistic levels, and the concomitants of these (micro-)changes. These (micro-)changes cluster with respect to their converging properties, but stand out in case they are unique properties. Clusters of correlated (micro-)changes may correspond to a composite change traditionally labeled ‘grammaticalization’, ‘lexicalization’ or ‘pragmaticalization’, but they may also pattern in alternative ways. This is what happens in the case studies in this dissertation.
The case studies in this dissertation defy strict categorization. Therefore, it is proposed to give up the idea that linguistic changes can be assigned to predefined categories. Instead, it is argued that it is more sensible to reduce lexicalization, grammaticalization and pragmaticalization to their basic mechanisms of change, primitive changes and the concomitants of these (micro-)changes. The advantage of clustering, as opposed to categorization, is that one can identify prototypical and marginal instances of lexicalization, grammaticalization and pragmaticalization, and interfaces between these types language change.
Last modified: | 13 March 2020 12.59 a.m. |
More news
-
16 April 2024
UG signs Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information
In a significant stride toward advancing responsible research assessment and open science, the University of Groningen has officially signed the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information.
-
15 April 2024
‘The European elections will be as boring as always’
UG researchers Ritumbra Manuvie, Pieter de Wilde, and Lisa Gaufman look ahead to the elections in India, Europe, and the United States, respectively. This week: Pieter de Wilde. He predicts that the European elections will be as boring as always.
-
02 April 2024
Flying on wood dust
Every two weeks, UG Makers puts the spotlight on a researcher who has created something tangible, ranging from homemade measuring equipment for academic research to small or larger products that can change our daily lives. That is how UG...