Title: Taking governance seriously in legal research
Several academic discourses on governance are going on since the 1970s and 1980s. They relate to different fields of law and regulation, including corporation law (corporate governance), administrative law (good governance of public administrations), international law and international relations (governance of nations and global governance), legal theory (governance as a legal style), EU law (governance of the EU), European private law and governance, Internet law and governance, law and governance of the health care system, contract law and governance, land law and governance, etc.
To a great extent, these discourses have been running separately from each other. An academic meta-discourse on law and governance that compares all these discourses and binds them together is still missing.
I believe that developing such a comparative meta-discourse would benefit both science and society. In particular, we would need a comparative analysis of the good governance aspects pertaining to the above-mentioned ten discourses. This would let us better reflect on good governance in each single field of law and regulation, and help societal actors better realise such good governance.
A first comparison of the said ten discourses enables us to single out some core features of good governance: legality, efficiency, transparency, accountability, best representation of interests, non-discrimination, and human rights protection. Arguably, these are universal parameters of good governance of every human institution, be it public, private or public-private. Therefore, public law scholars and private law scholars should work together much more intensively than they are actually doing now.
The Dutch Research Council (NWO) has awarded Prof. Lude Franke a Vici grant worth € 1.5 million. The Vici grant will enable him to develop innovative lines of research for the next five years. Vici is one of the largest personal academic grants...
De online uitzending van Publieksacademie voor de Rechtspraak van donderdag 18 februari stond in het teken van coronawetgeving.
In opdracht van het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) is door onderzoekers van de Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid van de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen onderzoek uitgevoerd naar de vraag of het huidige alimentatierecht nog wel van...
The website of the UG uses functional and anonymous analytics cookies. Do you also accept other cookies such as tracking cookies? If no choice is made, only basic cookies are placed. More information
The website of the UG uses functional and analytics cookies. Please choose your preferences. Read our privacy and cookie disclaimer for more information.