Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Medical Sciences Education WHO-CCCE Projects Cancer education in Europe
University Medical Center Groningen

Questions and data from the students questionnaire

1. During your training as a medical student, about how many patients did you see with the following malignant diseases?
Please differentiate between:
  • (a) new patients (before treatment)
  • (b) cured patients (in follow-up clinic)
  • (c) not-cured patient with advanced disease

Number of patients

new

cured

not-cured

Lung cancer

5.4

3.7

4.9

Breast cancer

7.5

8.1

4.3

Oesophageal cancer

1.6

1.2

1.2

Stomach cancer

3.3

3.4

1.8

Colorectal cancer

6.6

6.0

3.1

Skin cancer

3.6

3.1

0.7

Cutaneous melanoma

1.6

1.2

0.5

Cancer of the oral cavity

1.3

1.0

0.6

Cancer of the larynx

1.5

2.2

0.8

Salivary gland tumours

0.5

0.4

0.1

Thyroid cancer

2.1

2.2

0.5

Cancer of the cervix

3.1

4.0

1.0

Cancer of the endometrium

1.8

2.0

0.6

Cancer of the ovary

1.8

2.0

0.9

Cancer of the vagina

0.3

0.3

0.1

Cancer of the vulva

0.4

0.4

0.2

Cancer of the kidney

2.0

2.0

0.7

Bladder cancer

2.2

2.3

1.0

Cancer of the prostate

4.3

3.7

2.0

Testicular cancer

1.3

1.5

0.4

Soft tissue sarcomas

0.8

0.6

0.4

Bone tumours

1.2

1.1

0.6

Leukemia

4.8

5.7

3.2

Malignant lymphoma

2.8

3.5

1.7

Pediatric malignant diseases

2.2

2.7

1.2

Primary brain tumours (adults)

2.0

1.7

1.0

Others

3.4

1.8

0.7

2. How much attention does your medical curriculum pay to the following aspects of cancer control and cancer care?

Data in %

sufficient

insufficient

not at all

don't know

Epidemiology

77

19

2

1

Screening techniques

66

27

6

2

Early detection

60

34

4

2

Disease prevention (life style counseling, nutrition, etc.)

50

41

8

1

High risk groups

79

15

4

2

Patient and family counseling

24

49

23

5

Psychosocial support

14

54

30

3

Communication skills with patients, relatives

21

50

27

3

Communication skills with other health professionals

28

41

28

4

Quality of life

30

49

16

5

Pain management

51

38

8

3

Palliative care

57

34

7

2

Terminal care

34

46

17

3

Hospital versus home care

21

49

25

5

Support groups, reach to recovery groups

12

43

35

9

Role of doctor in health promotion (e.g. against smoking)

42

43

14

1

Non-proven (alternative) methods

6

39

45

10

Tumour biology

59

29

8

4

Basic cancer research

50

34

13

3

3. Did your undergraduate medical curriculum have specific clinical instruction (other than in the pathology course) about the following cancer related topics?

Data in %

yes

no

don't know

General introduction in clinical oncology

70

18

12

Lung cancer

85

12

3

Breast cancer

87

9

4

Oesophageal cancer

73

18

10

Stomach cancer

79

14

7

Colorectal cancer

86

10

4

Skin cancer

73

18

8

Cutaneous melanoma

74

19

17

Cancer of the oral cavity

44

40

16

Cancer of the larynx

67

25

9

Salivary gland tumours

44

41

15

Thyroid cancer

79

15

7

Cancer of the cervix

82

11

7

Cancer of the endometrium

76

14

10

Cancer of the ovary

75

15

10

Cancer of the vagina

58

27

14

Cancer of the vulva

59

27

14

Cancer of the kidney

66

24

10

Bladder cancer

66

24

10

Cancer of the prostate

75

20

5

Testicular cancer

65

28

8

Soft tissue sarcomas

40

45

14

Bone tumours

60

30

11

Leukemia

81

15

4

Malignant lymphoma

76

19

6

Pediatric malignant diseases

60

27

13

Primary brain tumours (adults)

56

32

12

Others

0

0

0

.
4. What three things would you suggest could be done that would improve cancer education at your medical school?    Top three items were:
  1. more psychosocial topics
  2. see more patients, more bedside teaching
  3. better teachers, teacher training.

Immediately following item 3 the students mentioned: more cancer patients, more bedside teaching.

.
5. Within how many months will you graduate as a medical doctor?
Within ... months.


Thank you very much for your cooperation!

It is not necessary for you to fill in your name and address.
However, if you do, we will send you (in the course of 1992) a summary of the report about the survey.
Name: ................
Address: ....................

Summary of the report about the survey for Student Respondents - 1992

This is a short communication concerning the Second WHO/UICC Survey on Undergraduate Medical Cancer Education in Europe for student-respondents who indicated their wish to receive a summary of the results. The purpose of the survey was to identify centres of activity with respect to undergraduate cancer education in Europe.

Method

The student-questionnaire was developed after consulting several medical and education experts, and was tested with a pilot group of medical students in Groningen. Participation was sought by requesting deans of European medical schools to appoint a representative in their school who would be willing to distribute the questionnaire among 5-10 students who were about to graduate as a medical doctor. This resulted in 383 processable responses from students who would graduate within 9 months. The students represent 93 medical schools in 27 European countries.

Results

The number of cancer patients that students see during their medical training varies considerably. Some students encounter about 25 cancer patients during medical education, other students see up to 500 cancer patients. Breast cancer and lung cancer are most often seen, while malignant tumours of the vulva and the thyroid are among the rare encounters. Patients with melanoma are somewhere in between. The final question in the questionnaire was: What three things would you suggest could be done that would improve cancer education at your medical school? The top-three items were:

  1. more psychosocial topics
  2. see more patients, more bedside teaching
  3. better teachers, teacher training.

Immediately following item 3 the students mentioned: more cancer patients, more bedside teaching.

Discussion

Student-encounters with cancer patient have been advocated for different reasons. Whether such encounters really take place, depends on opportunities, on teacher policies and on student initiatives. Our results from the survey show that opportunities are unequally distributed among medical schools. This explains at least partly the rather low average number of cancer patients seen by medical students. But on the other hand we found within one school differences between individual students, which may reflect teacher policies and/or student initiatives.

These results lead to questions like:

  • Is it acceptable that students graduate as a medical doctor without ever having seen a patient with a thyroid cancer?
  • Is it acceptable that they have seen on average only one new patient with testicular cancer?
  • Is the modest position of melanoma compared with the high position of lung cancer a reasonable and/or acceptable result?

These and other questions will be topics of discussion in international meetings of the World Health Organization, the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer, the European Association for Cancer Education, and the like.

Last modified:27 November 2015 4.04 p.m.