Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

New Gronings Perspectief study: increased stress due to damage and reinforcement in gas extraction area

25 January 2022
Damage in Oldenzijl, Groningen. Photo: Reyer Boxem

Following improvements in 2020, the health of Groningen residents whose properties have sustained damage as a result of gas extraction clearly deteriorated in 2021. In addition, trust in the Dutch government decreased. The health and perceived safety of residents has been found to deteriorate during part of the housing reinforcement operation that is intended to restore the safety of homes. The researchers, Prof. Katherine Stroebe and Prof. Michel Dückers of the University of Groningen, conclude that the indirect consequences of gas extraction, such as the procedures for and solutions to problems, appear to be just as stressful as the earthquakes and the damage that they cause.

How are the perceived safety, trust, and health of the residents of Groningen’s earthquake area developing? What impact is housing reinforcement having? And are the indirect consequences (solutions and procedures surrounding damage and reinforcement) just as bad as the original ‘ailment’ (earthquakes and damage to houses)? These were the central questions in the two 2021 panel measurements as part of the long-term research project Gronings Perspectief.

Decreased health and trust of residents with damage

Both April and October 2021 saw significant decreases in health among residents who were dealing with one or multiple cases of damage compared to previous years. People with multiple damage in particular suffered from poorer health. Trust in the Dutch government also decreased. Stroebe: ‘In 2020 we saw an improvement in health, even in people facing multiple instances of damage, but the tide is now turning. We do not know exactly why. I think that the current problems do not inspire optimism: there is a slow-moving reinforcement operation, the threat of increasing gas extraction, a lot of new rules and procedures – many residents lack the prospect that things will get better soon.’

Reinforcement as a stress factor

Residents whose houses are being reinforced are more at risk: they have poorer health than those who do not have to deal with reinforcement. Additional analyses show that it matters which phase of reinforcement residents are in: their health deteriorates and they feel less safe during the phase between assessment and planning. Some recovery occurs when construction is complete, but it is unclear whether this continues. Stroebe: ‘The analysis shows no improvements in health and safety as a result of the reinforcements. In fact, the opposite seems to be the case, although additional analyses are still needed. The current analyses show that attention must at least be paid to residents in the phase between assessment and planning. They are not doing well.’

Indirect consequences of gas extraction

The current research clearly confirms that the hassle that people experience with authorities and procedures as a result of gas extraction negatively affects their health, perceived safety, and trust. Reinforcement was supposed to solve the problem but has turned out to be a stress factor. In addition, residents themselves indicate that indirect consequences in particular (slow and unfair procedures and long-term uncertainty) make them vulnerable to the problems surrounding gas extraction. Stroebe: ‘Our previous research showed that hassle with authorities and procedures is very stressful, and our current report further supports this. You could well say that the solutions offered are perhaps almost as bad as the original ailment; earthquakes and damage.’

About Gronings Perspectief

Gronings Perspectief is a collaboration between the University of Groningen and the Groningen Social Planning Office, led by Prof. Stroebe and Prof. Dückers. The research team is assisted by a supervisory committee comprising several municipalities, the Municipal Health Service, special interest group Groninger Bodem Beweging, cross-sectoral collective of social organizations Groninger Gasberaad, the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, the National Coordinator for Groningen, the Province of Groningen, the Veiligheidsregio (Safety Region) Groningen, and the Association of Groningen Villages, as well as scientific experts.

The Gronings Perspectief team has been studying the health, perceived safety, and future prospects of residents of all municipalities in the gas extraction area since 2016. Since 2021 it has received funding for this research from the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations; previous funds came from the National Coordinator for Groningen. A panel of Groningen residents periodically completes a questionnaire on safety, health, and future prospects. All of the findings of Gronings Perspectief are published on the website

Last modified:26 January 2022 1.31 p.m.
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 13 May 2024

    Trapping molecules

    In his laboratory, physicist Steven Hoekstra is building an experimental set-up made of two parts: one that produces barium fluoride molecules, and a second part that traps the molecules and brings them to an almost complete standstill so they can...

  • 29 April 2024

    Tactile sensors

    Every two weeks, UG Makers puts the spotlight on a researcher who has created something tangible, ranging from homemade measuring equipment for academic research to small or larger products that can change our daily lives. That is how UG...

  • 16 April 2024

    UG signs Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information

    In a significant stride toward advancing responsible research assessment and open science, the University of Groningen has officially signed the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information.