Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

Gas extraction policy causes long-term stagnation to the lives of Groningers

28 May 2019

Why do so many residents of the Groningen earthquake zone feel chronically unsafe? And how do the structural reinforcement efforts affect them? The Gronings Perspectief research project conducted a survey among 3,917 inhabitants of Groningen, as well as interviewing residents and professionals. While the problems that residents face continue to accumulate, policy measures ignore these problems. Structural reinforcements aggravate rather than relieve the problems in the short term, causing stagnation in the lives of residents. These are the conclusions that Dr Arie Kapteyn and Prof. Ton Postmes of the University of Groningen have drawn from research as commissioned by the National Coordinator Groningen.

Residents had just started to feel a little safer again when an earthquake struck Westerwijtwerd on 22 May 2019. Even before that date, however, around 40-50% of residents who had experienced multiple instances of damage felt permanently unsafe due to the ongoing uncertainty, the slow handling of damage claims and a lack of solutions to their problems. Official bodies are not offering them what they need. Stroebe: ‘We are witnessing the disruption of the lives of people who won’t be able to relocate for many years, who have financial worries or who have been fighting unequal and endless battles with official bodies. Increasing numbers of residents can no longer cope due to stress, while additional measures have been lacking so far. The present policy measures fail to address the practical problems that residents face: the gradual reduction of gas extraction and the structural reinforcements may turn out to be effective solutions in 10 years, but the residents are experiencing real problems today.’

Structural reinforcements

Interviews reveal that the structural reinforcements are disrupting residents’ lives. It takes years for these reinforcements to be put into place, and all this time, residents’ lives are stagnant as they depend on ever-changing decision-making. Once the reinforcements have started, residents are relieved and collaboration with the official bodies is generally good, but the extra strain that this puts on residents poses a risk. Residents and professionals identify the same problems: the approach is too complex, with too many organizations and organizational layers slowing down the decision-making process. Stroebe: ‘We are deeply concerned about the strain that structural reinforcement puts on residents. Residents and community leaders should have more of a say in planning and decision-making. The reinforcements need to be put in place faster, less as a top- down procedure and in a much simpler way.’


So, what keeps these residents from losing faith? Residents who have experienced multiple instances of damage remain hopeful as long as their lives don’t revolve around earthquakes alone. Particularly at this stage, residents and communities benefit from having other activities to focus on. This emphasizes the importance of investing in the quality of life, associations and clubs and residents’ initiatives.

About Gronings Perspectief

Gronings Perspectief is a collaboration between the University of Groningen, the Groningen Municipal Health Service (GGD) and the Groningen Social and Cultural Planning Office. The researchers are assisted by a supervisory committee comprising the relevant municipalities, the local health authority, the Groninger Bodembeweging (a special interests group), the Groninger Gasberaad (a cross-sectoral collective of social organizations), the National Coordinator Groningen, the Province of Groningen, the Veiligheidsregio (safety region) and the Association of Groningen Villages, as well as scientific experts.

Since 2016, a team led by Dr Stroebe and Prof. Postmes has been studying the health, sense of safety and prospects of the residents of all municipalities in the Province of Groningen as commissioned by the National Coordinator Groningen. Since then, a panel of Groningen residents has filled out questionnaires about safety, health and prospects seven times. This report is part of the second phase of this study. The Phase 1 and Phase 2 findings of Gronings Perspectief have been outlined in various academic reports and have been published online on

Gronings perspectief


The website contains further information, alongside the research report.
For more information, please contact Justin Richardson of Gronings Perspectief on 06 – 46294540 or Jorien Bakker, UG spokesperson, on 06-11800452.

Last modified:11 May 2020 4.25 p.m.
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 12 September 2023

    Art in times of AI

    Leonardo Arriagada Beltran conducted his PhD research on the interface of computer-generated art and the constantly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). He will defend his Phd thesis on 21 September. His research offers valuable insights...

  • 28 August 2023

    Harish Vedantham and Casper van der Kooi nominated for 'Wetenschapstalent 2023'

    Harish Vedantham and Casper van der Kooi have been nominated by New Scientist for Wetenschapstalent 2023 (Science Talent 2023). This election is meant to give young scientists and their research a stage.

  • 26 July 2023

    Five promising UG researchers to top institutes abroad on Rubicon grants

    No less than five promising PhD graduates from the University of Groningen will be able to conduct research at top institutes abroad for two years thanks to the Rubicon programme organized by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research...