Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

Why lightning often strikes twice

New study reveals needle-like structures in positively charged lightning leaders
17 April 2019

In contrast to popular belief, lightning often does strike twice, but the reason why a lightning channel is ‘reused’ has remained a mystery. Now, an international research team led by the University of Groningen has used the LOFAR radio telescope to study the development of lightning flashes in unprecedented detail. Their work reveals that the negative charges inside a thundercloud are not discharged all in a single flash, but are in part stored alongside the leader channel at interruptions. This occurs inside structures which the researchers have called needles. Through these needles, a negative charge may cause a repeated discharge to the ground. The results were published on 18 April in the science journal Nature.

Olaf Scholten LOFAR onweer
Lightning above the central part of LOFAR "Superterp", by: Danielle Futselaar

“This finding is in sharp contrast to the present picture, in which the charge flows along plasma channels directly from one part of the cloud to another, or to the ground”, explains Olaf Scholten, Professor of Physics at the KVI-CART institute of the University of Groningen. The reason why the needles have never been seen before lies in the ‘supreme capabilities’ of LOFAR, adds his colleague Dr Brian Hare, first author of the paper: “These needles can have a length of 100 metres and a diameter of less than five metres, and are too small and too short-lived for other lightning detections systems.”

Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) is a Dutch radio telescope consisting of thousands of rather simple antennas spread out over Northern Europe. These antennas are connected with a central computer through fibre-optic cables, which means that they can operate as a single entity. LOFAR is developed primarily for radio astronomy observations, but the frequency range of the antennas also makes it suitable for lightning research, as discharges produce bursts in the VHF (very high frequency) radio band.

Inside the cloud

For the present lightning observations, the scientists have used only the Dutch LOFAR stations, which cover an area of 3,200 square kilometres. This new study analysed the raw time-traces (which are accurate to one nanosecond) as measured in the 30-80 MHz band. Brian Hare: “These data allow us to detect lightning propagation at a scale where, for the first time, we can distinguish the primary processes. Furthermore, the use of radio waves allows us to look inside the thundercloud, where most of the lightning resides.”

Lightning occurs when strong updrafts generate a kind of static electricity in large cumulonimbus clouds. Parts of the cloud become positively charged and others negatively. When this charge separation is large enough, a violent discharge happens, which we know as lightning. Such a discharge starts with a plasma, a small area of ionized air hot enough to be electrically conductive. This small area grows into a forked plasma channel that can reach lengths of several kilometres. The positive tips of the plasma channel collect negative charges from the cloud, which pass through the channel to the negative tip, where the charge is discharged. It was already known that a large amount of VHF emissions is produced at the growing tips of the negative channels while the positive channels show emissions only along the channel, not at the tip.

A new algorithm

The scientists developed a new algorithm for LOFAR data, allowing them to visualize the VHF radio emissions from two lightning flashes. The antenna array and the very precise time stamp on all the data allowed them to pinpoint the emission sources with unprecedented resolution. “Close to the core area of LOFAR, where the antenna density is highest, the spatial accuracy was about one metre”, says Professor Scholten. Furthermore, the data obtained was capable of localizing 10 times more VHF sources than other three-dimensional imaging systems, with a temporal resolution in the range of nanoseconds. This resulted in a high-resolution 3D image of the lightning discharge.


The results clearly show the occurrence of a break in the discharge channel, at a location where needles are formed. These appear to discharge negative charges from the main channel, which subsequently re-enter the cloud. The reduction of charges in the channel causes the break. However, once the charge in the cloud becomes high enough again, the flow through the channel is restored, leading to a second discharge of lightning. By this mechanism, lightning will strike in the same area repeatedly.

Scholten: “The VHF emissions along the positive channel are due to rather regularly repeated discharges along previously formed side channels, the needles. These needles appear to drain the charges in a pulsed manner.” This is a totally new phenomenon, adds Professor Joe Dwyer of the University of New Hampshire (US), third author of the paper: “Our new observation techniques show copious amounts of needles in the lightning flash, which have not been seen before.” And Brian Hare concludes: “From these observations, we see that a part of the cloud is re-charged, and we can understand why a lightning discharge to the ground may repeat itself a few times.”


Reference: Brian Hare, Olaf Scholten, Joe Dwyer, et al. Needle-like structures discovered on positively charged lightning branches. Nature, 18 April 2019.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1086-6

Additional material:

Of the real observations used for this paper, a few interesting videos are available:

  • Video 1: Lightning-complete_fixed (using the data of figure 1 of the article): The video shows the development of the lightning in slow motion. In real time, the duration is less than 0.2 seconds and towards the end the discharge, spans about five kilometres in all directions. The bright yellow flashes are the new radio pulses detected, which quickly fade to small white dots to give the sense of the structure. The positively charged lightning channels are seen at the top of the lightning flash, grow upwards, and appear to twinkle because of the newly discovered needles. The twinkling is most active between 0:14 and 0:21 seconds. The negatively charged channels grow downwards, and are seen to grow continuously (they don’t twinkle). One negative channel even reaches ground at 0:14 seconds. Towards the end of the video, there is still some activity along the positive channel.
  • Video 2: Lightning-Needle (using the data of figure 2a of the article): The video shows a zoom-in on the positively charged channel. In real time, the development takes only 0.1 seconds and spans a distance of about 400 metres. Initially, there is little activity along the channel: it is barely visible. Only at 0:10 seconds does one see the needles develop. One particularly large needle is depicted in red. Multiple needles can be seen along the lightning channel, with each one, including the red one, ‘lighting up’ multiple times. At 0:20 seconds, the activity in this part of the channel stops, with some activity remaining at more distant points along the channel.

Credits for the videos: Stijn Buitink (VUB, Brussels) and Brian Hare (University of Groningen).

Contributing institutions are:

1 KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2 InterUniversity Institute for High Energies, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
3 Department of Physics and Space Science Center (EOS), University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
4 Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
5 Departmentof Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
6 ASTRON, Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
7 NIKHEF, Science Park Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
8 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Physics, Karlsruhe, Germany
9 Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
10 DESY, Zeuthen, Germany
11 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
12 Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
13 Department 1, Geodesy GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
14 Science and Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
15 Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
16 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
17 University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
18 ResearchSchool of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
19 Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching, Germany
20 Smarter Vision BV, Assen, The Netherlands
21 Thüringer Landessternwarte, Tautenburg, Germany
22 Jodrell Bank Center for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
23 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
24 LPC2E—Université d’Orleans/CNRS, Orléans, France
25 Station de Radioastronomie de Nancay, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS/INSU, Université d’Orleans, OSUC, Nancay, France
26 Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
27 Department of Physics,The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
28 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Space Radio-Diagnostics Research Centre, Olsztyn, Poland
29 Center for Information Technology (CIT), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
30 CRAL, Observatoire de Lyon, Université Lyon, UMR5574, Saint Genis Laval, France
31 Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center (PCSS), Poznan, Poland
32 Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany
33 Space Research Center PAS, Warsaw, Poland
34 Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
35 Department of Physics and Electronics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
36 SKA South Africa, Pinelands, South Africa
37 Jagiellonian University, Astronomical Observatory, Krakow, Poland
38 LESIA & USN, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, PSL/SU/UPMC/UPD/SPC, Meudon, France

Last modified:11 May 2020 1.26 p.m.
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 24 June 2024

    Measuring stickiness

    Several plant species use tiny sticky droplets to attract and trap insects. These droplets form an ideal toxin-free insecticide that could be easily washed off of edible plants. Abinaya Arunachalam built a tool to measure the stickiness of...

  • 18 June 2024

    Hydrogen as an indirect greenhouse gas

    Hydrogen is an indirect greenhouse gas: by reacting with other compounds in the atmosphere, it may contribute to global warming in several ways.

  • 17 June 2024

    UG wins two out of six ENLIGHT Impact Awards

    During the second edition of the ENLIGHT Impact Awards on 11 June in Bilbao, the RUG won two of the six Impact Awards.