Ineffective medicine could seem effective enough for licensing
New statistical research challenges the strength of evidence required by the US Food and Drug Administration for its endorsement of new medication. University of Groningen psychologist and statistician Don van Ravenzwaaij concludes this in a paper co-authored by prof. John Ioannidis from Stanford University. The paper has been published in PLOS ONE.
Van Ravenzwaaij came up with the idea for the study when he read the manual published by the FDA in which its endorsement procedure is explained. Legislation by Congress on the matter is understood by the FDA to prescribe two trials that have convincingly demonstrated the effectiveness of a product as a precondition for endorsement.
“Which sounds reasonable enough”, explains Van Ravenzwaaij. “But what it does not indicate is two out of how many trials we are talking about here. Two positive trials out of two attempts is not the same as two out of five of which three trials were negative.” Van Ravenzwaaij and Ioannidis now argue that if one adopts strictly a policy of coming up with two trials with positive results this policy may allow ineffective medication to slip through.
Simulations of the model
Van Ravenzwaaij and Ioannidis subjected the endorsement model to a number of simulations, altering factors such as the number of trials or the population size in trial studies. Their finding: in a non-trivial number of cases a medical product can produce two positive trials while the totality of evidence points to the absence of a medical effect. In English: it is possible that products that do not work better than a placebo are endorsed.
Their point is not about concrete ineffective products that have been endorsed. Van Ravenzwaaij: “FDA and other regulatory agencies may consider many other aspects of the evidence before making a licensing decision. We felt that the more pressing point was to demonstrate that the policy of “2 positive trials” itself is vulnerable in its requirement of evidence for medical effectiveness. The upshot of our results is that strict application of this policy for licensing purposes can potentially lead to ineffective medication on the market.”
Don van Ravenzwaaij works at the Psychometric and Statistics Department at the University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. John Ioannidis is professor in Medicine and in Health Research and Policy at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
More information:
The link to the publication: ‘A Simulation Study of the Strength of Evidence in the Recommendation of Medications Based on Two Trials with Statistically Significant Results’
Last modified: | 12 March 2020 9.34 p.m. |
More news
-
09 April 2024
Kirsten van den Bosch: 'Connecting students with the work field really is achievable in every programme'
Dr Kirsten van den Bosch en her team won the Best Practice Award 2024 with their initiative to connect students with organizations to solve real problems within Academic Learning Communities.
-
03 April 2024
Research: much stress among Groningers due to gas extraction issues, including among the elderly
The gas extraction issue still has its effect on people in Groningen. Questionnaire research shows that people who had multiple instances of damage to their homes have increasingly poor health. In addition, interviews with elderly people show a...
-
05 March 2024
'Ordinary Joes can also be creative'
Organizational psychologist Eric Rietzschel researches creativity in the workplace. According to him, creativity enables us to move forward, but there is also a downside.