Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
About us Latest news News News articles

A neutral conception of punishment. A philosophical analysis

30 June 2011

PhD ceremony: Mr. V.C. Geeraets, 16.15 uur, Doopsgezinde Kerk, Oude Boteringestraat 33, Groningen

Dissertation: A neutral conception of punishment. A philosophical analysis

Promotor(s): prof. A.R. Mackor, prof. W. van der Burg

Faculty: Law

 

The claim central of Geeraets’s dissertation is that a neutral conception offers a better interpretation of the concept of punishment than a normative conception. The point of the neutral conception is that it characterises a number of impositions as punishment which are normally not classified as such. Particularly, the neutral conception classifies the Dutch reparative sanction (administrative law), the measure of TBS (a response to the violation of a norm by someone who is suffering from a mental disease) and the measure of ISD (a response to repeat offence) as punishment. The normative conception - in contrast - stipulates that these sanctions are not punishment. Despite the fact that the normative conception is better in line with how the concept of punishment is employed in the legal arena, Geeraets maintains that the neutral conception is more fruitful. Adoption of the normative conception can easily result in what he calls quietism. By denoting these sanctions as something other than punishment, it encourages a quietism that takes them to be therefore less problematic than punishment, or requiring less in the way of protective procedures and constraints than punishment does. Instead, the neutral conception obliges us to bring into the open what choices we make and to make explicit what, for example, the basis is for a differentiation in legal protection.

The goal in this dissertation is to develop a neutral conception and to discuss and rebut possible objections. To this end, the following subjects pass in review: the justificatory theories of retributivism and utilitarianism, the legal principle ‘no punishment without guilt’, the principle of proportionality, the distinction between direct and oblique intent and the idea that by means of punishment the personality of the offender is respected. In each case, Geeraets investigates how the idea in question relates to the concept of punishment.

 

Last modified:13 March 2020 01.11 a.m.
Share this Facebook LinkedIn
View this page in: Nederlands

More news

  • 07 May 2025

    Public Academy lecture 'The right to demonstrate' 22 May 2025

    Thousands of demonstrations take place in the Netherlands every year. These demonstrations raise many questions about the right to demonstrate. This topic is the subject of the Public Academy for Jurisprudence on 22 May at 07.30 p.m. - 9 p.m. During...

  • 07 May 2025

    Maffiapraktijken in Nederland: zijn we gewaarschuwd?

    Nederland krijgt te maken met steeds gewelddadigere criminaliteit: liquidaties op klaarlichte dag, bedreigde journalisten, en explosies bij woningen. In Nederland zijn we dit niet gewend.

  • 22 April 2025

    Impact | Online advice about right to freedom of assembly

    In the coming weeks the nominees for the Ben Feringa Impact Award 2025 will introduce themselves and their impactful research or project. This week: Noor Swart and Berend Roorda, on their online information initiative on the right of freedom to...