F.M.D. (Frank) Vanclay, Prof

Hoogleraar Culturele Geograpfie

Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen

Telefoon:

E-mail:

frank.vanclay rug.nl

Homepage ORCID Research Portal

Publicaties

How communities and social impacts are considered in policies for protected areas in China

Zhang, Y., Vanclay, F. & Hanna, P., jan.-2025, In: Land Use Policy. 148, 10 blz., 107404.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

Rebuilding project-affected livelihoods using the Graduation Approach

Esteves, A. M., Maurtua Konstantinidis, A., Carroll, B., Gouley, C. & Vanclay, F., dec.-2025, In: Extractive Industries and Society. 24, 14 blz., 101757.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

Social impacts from tourism development in protected areas: Comparing communities in different conservation zones of Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China

Zhang, Y., Hanna, P. & Vanclay, F., nov.-2025, In: Land Use Policy. 158, 13 blz., 107753.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

Social revolution and mining projects: The potential role of cultural power in transforming mining conflict

Kowszyk, Y., Walter, M., Maher, R. & Vanclay, F., dec.-2025, In: Extractive Industries and Society. 24, 11 blz., 101733.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

Using environmental and social impact assessment to improve tourism infrastructure projects in protected areas: Green tourism in the Kalinzu Central Forest Reserve in Uganda

Kahangirwe, P., Vanclay, F. & Arts, J., 22-jul.-2025, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 24 blz.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

After 50 years of social impact assessment, is it still fit for purpose?

Vanclay, F., jul.-2024, In: Current Sociology. 72, 4, blz. 774-788 15 blz.

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review

Benefit-sharing and enhancing outcomes for project-affected communities

Vanclay, F., 14-mrt.-2024, Handbook of Social Impact Assessment and Management. Vanclay, F. & Esteves, A. M. (uitgave). Edward Elgar Publishing, blz. 426-443 18 blz. (Handbook of Social Impact Assessment and Management).

Onderzoeksoutput › › peer review