The website of the UG uses functional and anonymous analytics cookies. Do you also accept other cookies such as tracking cookies? If no choice is made, only basic cookies are placed. More information
The website of the UG uses functional and analytics cookies. Please choose your preferences. Read our privacy and cookie disclaimer for more information.
This is about Y. Y possesses something quite valuable. Y obtained the opportunity to model his life the way he wants to. He possesses complete freedom. After learning about his option, he’ll make well-considered choices. Success is within reach. This is about Y, but also about how his freedom interferes with his happiness.
I am Y. And most likely, so are you. Everyone that was born between, say, 1980 and 2000 belongs to generation Y. Together, we’ve formed a generation that, in general, is convinced that people are for a great deal responsible for their quality of life. Thanks to our freedom of choice, success can now be achieved by practically anyone. At least, that’s what we believe. We experience a higher need to perform well. Because doing well is possible. By having great study results for instance, or an important job on the side and a great group of friends. A healthy diet, sports, and enough sleep should be only normal. Because you have the possibilities.
Y makes his choices, but that doesn’t always make him happy. Because Y knows that choosing is losing. After all, when deciding to go with a certain option, Y misses out on all the other options. And when a choice turns out to be not so great, then that’s only the fault of the one that made that decision. American Psychologist Barry Schwartz discusses the negative effects of freedom of choice in ‘The Paradox of Choice’. When we truly believe that we are fully in charge of our own lives, than we consequentially become responsible for every possible thing in our lives that could be improved. That’s harsh to say the least. The maximizer definitely had his share of issues with his freedom of choice.
Herbert Simon defined maximizers as the people that extensively weigh up the pros and cons of their options before making a decision. That’s how they hope to make the best possible choice. Contrary to these people, there are so-called satisficers: the people that are fine with one of the very first options that occur. Although maximizers tend to make better choices on average, somehow they are less happy about their decision. The ‘maximizing’ Y easily recognizes the negative effects of his choice, because comparing things has become his second nature.
Although the satisficers may not be role models in every way, there’s a lot to be learned from them. That it’s a good thing to stop pondering after a decision has been made, for instance. Or that your focus should be on the positive results instead of the negative results after choosing. And that you shouldn’t make the pressure of choosing bigger than necessary. Because, after all, a life is long and there are hardly any choices that define the rest of your life. Luckily for Y, he lives in a time packed with possibilities. Having to make so many choices also means that there will be new choices. There will be new chances after a less than great decision.
I wish you the best of luck, Y.
Plastics are among the most successful materials of modern times. However, they also create a huge waste problem. Scientists from the University of Groningen (The Netherlands) and the East China University of Science and Technology (ECUST) in...
On International Women’s Day this spring, Rector Magnificus Cisca Wijmenga announced that the UG would be creating 15 new chair positions for female professors, known as the Aletta Jacobs Chairs. Fifteen female professors will soon start their work...
On Friday 22 January 2021, the University of Groningen (UG) will award an honorary doctorate to Feike Sijbesma. The former CEO of DSM will be presented with his honorary doctorate by Rector Magnificus Cisca Wijmenga during the special Nobel...