prof. dr. J.C.J. (John) Hoeks

Full Professor of Communication and Information Sciences

Research

  1. 2019
  2. 2017
  3. 2016
  4. Ooms, J., Hoeks, J., & Jansen, C. J. M. (2016). Fear appeals in narratieven. In De macht van de taal. Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 161-175). Uitgeverij Acco.
  5. Donné, L., Jansen, C. J. M., Huijbers, P., & Hoeks, J. (2016). Interpersoonlijke communicatie over gezondheidsthema’s: Een verkennend onderzoek. In De macht van de taal. Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 11-25). Uitgeverij Acco.
  6. Donné, L., Jansen, C. J. M., Huijbers, P., & Hoeks, J. (2016). ‘Mijn kinderen luisteren toch niet’: Een verkennend onderzoek omtrent praten over gezondheidsthema’s. In D. Van De Mieroop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 11-25). Uitgeverij Acco.
  7. 2014
  8. Hoeks, J., & Brouwer, H. (2014). Electrophysiological research on conversation and discourse processing. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), Oxford University Handbook of Language and Social Cognition (pp. 365-386). Oxford University Press.
  9. 2012
  10. van den Akker, S., Hoeks, J. C. J., Spenader, J., & Hendriks, P. (2012). Is the Dutch Delay of Principle B Effect dependent on verb type? In S. Aalberse, & M. Elenbaas (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012 (pp. 1 - 14). John Benjamins Publishers.
  11. Hendriks, P., Koops van 't Jagt, R., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2012). Restricting quantifier scope in Dutch: Evidence from child language comprehension and production. In B. Stolterfoht, & S. Featherston (Eds.), Empirical approaches to linguistic theory: Studies of meaning and structure (pp. 147-168). (Studies in Generative Grammar). De Gruyter Mouton.
  12. 2011
  13. Hendriks, P., Banga, A., van Rij, J., Cannizzaro, C. L., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2011). Adult's comprehension of object pronouns in discourse: An eye-tracking study. In A. Grimm, A. Müller, C. Hamann, & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Production-Comprehension Asymmetries in Child Language (pp. 193-216). (Studies on language aquisition; Vol. 43). De Gruyter Mouton.
  14. Koster, C., Hoeks, J. C. J., & Hendriks, P. (2011). Comprehension and production of subject pronouns in child Dutch. In A. Grimm, A. Muller, C. Hamann, & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Production-Comprehension Asymmetries in Child Language (pp. 99-122). (Studies in Language Acquisition; No. 43). De Gruyter Mouton.
  15. 2010
  16. Dimitrova, D. V., Stowe, L. A., Redeker, G., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2010). ERP correlates of focus accentuation in Dutch. In Speech Prosody 2010 (Vol. 100873, pp. 1 - 4) http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/papers/100873.pdf
  17. Hoeks, J. C. J., Hendriks, P., Redeker, G., & Stowe, L. A. (2010). Gricean brainwaves: Brain responses to pragmatic violations in dialogues. In S. Ohlsson, & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1325 - 1329). Cognitive Science Society. http://palm.mindmodeling.org/cogsci2010/papers/0368/paper0368.pdf
  18. Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2010). Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory. In J. T. Hale (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, ACL2010 (pp. 72 - 80) http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W10/W10-2009.pdf
  19. 2009
  20. Hendriks, P., Hoeks, J. C. J., de Hoop, H., Krämer, I., Smits, E., Spenader, J., & de Swart, H. E. (2009). A large-scale investigation of scalar implicature. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 30 - 50). (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition). Palgrave MacMillan.
  21. Dimitrova, D. V., Redeker, G., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2009). Did you say a BLUE banana? The prosody of contrast and abnormality in Bulgarian and Dutch. In M. Uther, R. Moore, & S. Cox (Eds.), INTERSPEECH 2009: 10TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2009, VOLS 1-5 (pp. 999-1002). ISCA.
  22. Dimitrova, D. V., Redeker, G., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2009). Semantic Abnormality and Prosodic Prominence in Bulgarian and Dutch. In H. van Rijn, & N. Taatgen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2038).
  23. Wubs, E., Hendriks, P., Hoeks, J. C. J., & Koster, C. (2009). Tell me a story! Children's capacity for topic shift. In J. Crawford, K. Otaki, & M. Takahashi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008) (Proceedings of GALANA ed., Vol. 3, pp. 313 - 324). Cascadilla Press.
  24. Taylor, R. C., Stowe, L. A., Redeker, G., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2009). The referent of accented pronouns is determined by coherence relations. In N. Taatgen, & H. v. Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1621 - 1626)
  25. 2008
  26. Dimitrova, D. V., Redeker, G., Egg, M., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2008). Linguistic and extra-linguistic determinants of accentuation in Dutch. In P. Barbosa (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 409 - 412). ISCA.
  27. Dimitrova, D. V., Redeker, G., Egg, M., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2008). Prosodic correlates of linguistic and extra-linguistic information in Dutch. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2191 - 2196). Cognitive Science Society.
  28. 2007
  29. Hoeks, J. C. J., Hendriks, P., & Redeker, G. (2007). Prosody, context, and thematic fit meet “Gapping”: The interaction of multiple constraints in spoken sentence comprehension. In D. S. McNamara, & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1085 - 1090).
  30. 2006
  31. van der Feen, M., Hendriks, P., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2006). Constraints in Language Processing: Do Grammars Count? In P. Blache (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Constraints and Language Processing (CSLP-06) (pp. 1-8). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  32. Hoeks, J., Hendriks, P., & Zijlstra, L. (2006). The predominance of nonstructural factors in the processing of gapping sentences. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1511-1516). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. 2005
  34. Hoeks, J. C. J., & Hendriks, P. (2005). Optimality Theory and human sentence processing: The case of coordination. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 959-964). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://www.let.rug.nl/~hoeks/f286-hoeks.pdf
  35. Hoeks, J. C. J. (2005). Optimality Theory and the processing of coordinated structures. In B. Hommel, G. Band, W. LaHey, & G. Wolters (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (pp. 110 - 111). Leiden University Press.
  36. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Pijnacker, J. (2005). The neural substrate of the semantic illusion effect in sentence processing (Abstract in proceedings). In Host Publication (pp. 40 - 40). Leiden University Press.
  37. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Wunderink, C. (2005). Time is of the Essence: Processing Temporal Connectives During Reading. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 577-582). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. 2004
  39. Hoeks, J. C. J. (2004). Do readers use prediction in on-line sentence processing? In A. Widmer, E. Schröger, & T. Jacobsen (Eds.), Leipzig Studies in Cognitive Science: Proceedings of Epic (Evoked Potentials International Conference XIV) (pp. 106 - 106). Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
  40. Hoeks, J. C. J. (2004). Semantic Illusions during Sentence Comprehension. In A. Widmer, E. Schröger, & T. Jacobsen (Eds.), Leipzig Studies in Cognitive Science: Proceedings of Epic (Evoked Potentials International Conference XIV) (pp. 187 - 188). Leipziger Universitätsverlag.

ID: 194048