dr. J.A. (Jan Albert) van Laar

University lecturer

Research

Research units:

Postal address:
Oude Boteringestraat
52
Gebouw 1137, ruimte 0221
Groningen
Netherlands
Phone: +31 50 363 6163Fax: +31 50 363 6160
  1. 2019
  2. van Laar, J. A. (2019). Middle Ground: Settling a public controversy by means of a reasonable compromise. In J. A. Blair (Ed.), Studies in Critical Thinking (pp. 69-80). (Windsor Studies in Argumentation; Vol. 8). Windsor: Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric.
  3. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2019). Pressure and argumentation in Public Controversies. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & J. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 702-709). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  4. 2018
  5. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2018). Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 887-907). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 77). College Publications.
  6. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2018). In the Quagmire of Quibbles. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumenation (Vol. 1, pp. 283-303). (Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 76). College Publications.
  7. 2017
  8. van Laar, J. (2017). Connection premises: Their character, criticism, and defence. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone (Eds.), Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 39-55). (Argumentation in Context; Vol. 10). John Benjamins Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.03van
  9. 2016
  10. van Laar, J. (2016). Commentary on Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo and Timothy J. Norman’s paper “Speech acts and burden of proof in computational models of deliberation dialogue”. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 777-780). College Publications.
  11. van Laar, J. A. (2016). Commentary on Ralph H. Johnson’s “On Distinguishing Between an Objection and a Criticism”. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-4). OSSA.
  12. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Eerlijke en oneerlijke strategieën in maatschappelijke discussies. In D. Van De Mierop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 131-143). Leuven (Louvain)/ The Hague: Uitgeverij Acco.
  13. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies: The Case of Induced Earthquakes. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 343-362). (Studies in Logic ; Vol. 62). London: College Publications.
  14. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Reply to David Godden’s Commentary on “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-3). OSSA.
  15. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Splitting a Difference of Opinion. In P. Bondy, & L. Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp. 1-19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
  16. 2015
  17. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2015). That’s No Argument! The Ultimate Criticism? In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 793-804). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  18. 2014
  19. van Laar, J. A. (2014). Arguments from parallel reasoning. In H. J. Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy (pp. 91-107). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_6
  20. 2013
  21. van Laar, J. A. (2013). Commentary on: Cathal Woods' "The language and diagramming of rejection and objection". In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentaton: Proceedings of the 10th OSSA Conference at the University of Windsor, May 2013 (pp. 1-7)
  22. van Laar, J. A. (2013). Criticism in need of clarification. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th OSSA Conference at the University of Windsor, May 2013 (pp. 1-17). Windsor.
  23. 2012
  24. van Laar, J. A. (2012). Logical criticism and argumentation schemes: argument from expert opinion as a case in point. In H. J. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Inside arguments: logic and the study of argumentation (pp. 189 - 205). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  25. 2011
  26. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2011). The Burden of Criticism. In F. Zenker (Ed.), OSSA 9: Argumentation: Cognition & Community: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation: May 18-21, 2011, University of Windsor [CD-ROM] (pp. 907 - 923). Windsor, ON: University of Windsor.
  27. van Laar, J. A., & Godden, M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical approach to circularity in argumentation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 265 - 280). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishers.
  28. Krabbe, E. C. W., & van Laar, J. A. (2011). The Ways of Criticism: Four Parameters. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation [CD-ROM] (pp. 1023 - 1035). Amsterdam: Rozenberg/ Sic Sat.
  29. 2010
  30. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2010). About the Ways of Criticism. In C. Reed, F. Grasso, & N. Green (Eds.), CMNA X: the 10th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (pp. 20 - 28). Lisbon, Portugal: ECAI.
  31. van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2010). Examining the Examination Dialogue. In C. Reed, & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argument (pp. 31 - 44). (Tributes Series; No. 12). London: College Publications.
  32. 2009
  33. van Laar, J. A. (2009). Argumentative bluffing in eristic discussion. In Rhetoric in Society Leiden: Leiden University Press.
  34. Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2009). De pragma-dialectiek en de objectieve epistemische benadering van argumentatie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing. (pp. 73-83). Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
  35. 2008
  36. van Laar, J. A. (2008). Confrontation and ridicule. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo conference on argumentation: Argumentation, the law & justice (pp. 145-151). Tokyo.
  37. van Laar, J. A. (2008). Don't say that! In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 89 - 101). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
  38. van Laar, J. A. (2008). Pragmatic inconsistency and credibility. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation (3 ed., Vol. 21, pp. 163 - 179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers.
Previous 1 2 Next

ID: 106931