prof. mr. dr. H. (Henry) Prakken

Professor Legal Informatics and Legal Argumentation

Research

  1. 2018
  2. Prakken, H. (2018). Argument. In S. O. Hansson, & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy (pp. 63-79). (Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_2
  3. Wieten, R., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2018). Exploiting causality in constructing Bayesian network graphs from legal arguments. In M. Palmirani (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2018: The Thirty-First Annual Conference (pp. 151-160). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 313). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-151
  4. Prakken, H. (2018). Historical overview of formal argumentation. In P. Baroni, D. Gabbay, M. Giacomin, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of Formal Argumentation (Vol. 1, pp. 73-141). London: College Publications.
  5. Prakken, H. (2018). Komt de robotrechter er aan? Nederlands Juristenblad, 2018(4), 269-274. [NJB 2018/207].
  6. Prakken, H., & Meester, R. (2018). Reactie op Alkemades weerwoord. Expertise en Recht, 2018(1), 41-43.
  7. 2017
  8. Prakken, H. (2017). Argument schemes for discussing Bayesian modellings of complex criminal cases. In A. Z. Wyner, & G. Casini (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2017: The Thirtieth Annual Conference (pp. 69-78). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 302). IOS Press.
  9. Prakken, H. (2017). Logics of argumentation and the law. In P. H. Glenn, & L. D. Smith (Eds.), Law and the New Logics (pp. 3-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227329
  10. Prakken, H. (2017). On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for Dutch law. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 241-244). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086542
  11. 2016
  12. Prakken, H. (2016). On how AI & Law can help autonomous systems obey the law: a position paper. Paper presented at AI for Justice, Den Haag, Netherlands.
  13. 2015
  14. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Constructing and Understanding Bayesian Networks for Legal Evidence with Scenario Schemes. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 128-137). New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746097
  15. Timmer, S., Meyer, J. J., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). A Structure-guided Approach to Capturing Bayesian Reasoning about Legal Evidence in Argumentation. In ICAIL '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 109-118). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746093
  16. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Capturing critical questions in Bayesian network fragments. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. : JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference (Vol. 279, pp. 173-176). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  17. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Demonstration of a Structure-guided Approach to Capturing Bayesian Reasoning about Legal Evidence in Argumentation. In ICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 233-234). New York: ACM Press Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2750370
  18. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Explaining Bayesian Networks using Argumentation. In S. Destercke, & T. Denoeux (Eds.), Explaining Bayesian Networks using Argumentation: 13th European Conference, ECSQARU 2015, Compiègne, France, July 15-17, 2015. Proceedings (pp. 83-92). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 9161). Springer.
  19. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Explaining legal Bayesian networks using support graphs. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. : JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference. (pp. 121-130). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  20. Prakken, H. (2015). Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning. In M. Araszkiewicz, & K. Pleszka (Eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking (pp. 301-321). (Legisprudence Library; Vol. 2). Springer.
  21. Prakken, H. (2015). Legal Reasoning: Computational Models. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (2 ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  22. Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Representing the quality of crime scenarios in a Bayesian network. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference (pp. 131-140). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  23. 2014
  24. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). A Tool for the Generation of Arguments from Bayesian Networks. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2014 (pp. 479-480). ( Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 266). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-479
  25. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks. In R. Hoekstra (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2014: The Twenty-seventh Annual Conference (pp. 71-80). IOS Press.
  26. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). Extracting scenarios from a Bayesian network as explanations for legal evidence. In R. Hoekstra (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2014: The Twenty-seventh Annual Conference (pp. 103-112). IOS Press.
  27. 2013
  28. Prakken, H. (2013). Comments on Xiong and Xie. In J. van Benthem, & F. Liu (Eds.), Logic Across the University: Foundations and Application (pp. 497-501). London: College Publications.
  29. Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2013). Formalising arguments about norms. In K.D. Ashley (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Informations Systems. JURIX 2013: The Twenty-sixth Annual Conference (pp. 121-130). IOS Press.
  30. Timmer, S., Meyer, J. J., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Inference and attack in Bayesian networks. In K. Hindriks, M. De Weerdt, B. Van Riemsdijk, & M. Warnier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2013) (pp. 199-206). Delft: Delft University Press.
  31. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian Network. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013) (pp. 150-159). New York (New York): ACM Press.
  32. Prakken, H., Atkinson, K. D., & Wyner, A. Z. (2013). Overview of Trevor Bench-Capon's research. In K. D. Atkinson, H. Prakken, & A. Z. Wyner (Eds.), From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making: A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday (pp. 1-19). London: College Publications.
  33. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Representing and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian network. In M. A. Finlayson, B. Fisseni, B. Löwe, & J. C. Meister (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN 2013) (pp. 315-332). Dagstuhl: OASICS.
  34. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Unfolding crime scenarios with variations: a method for building a Bayesian network for legal narratives. 145-154. Paper presented at The 26th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Bologna, Italy.
  35. 2012
  36. Bench-Capon, T., Araszkiewicz, M., Ashley, K., Atkinson, K., Bex, F., Borges, F., ... Wyner, A. Z. (2012). A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 20(3), 215-319.
  37. Prakken, H., & Wei, B. (2012). Defining the structure of arguments with AI models of argumentation. In F. Grasso, N. Green, & C. Reed (Eds.), Proceedings of the ECAI-12 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA-12) (pp. 60-64). Montpellier, Frankrijk: ECCAI.
  38. Prakken, H., Kok, E. W., Meyer, J. J. C., & Vreeswijk, G. (2012). Testing the benefits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues. In P. McBurney, S. Parsons, & I. Rahwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ARGMAS-12) (pp. 87-106). Valencia (Spanje): International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).
Previous 1 2 3 Next

ID: 245857