prof. mr. dr. H. (Henry) Prakken

Professor Legal Informatics and Legal Argumentation

prof. mr. dr. H. (Henry) Prakken
E-mail:
h.prakken rug.nl

Research

  1. 2020
  2. 2019
  3. Prakken, H. (2019). Comparing alternative factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. In M. Araszkiewicz, & V. Rodriguez-Doncel (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2019: The Thirty-Second Annual Conference (pp. 73-82). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 322). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA190308
  4. Prakken, H. (2019). Modelling accrual of arguments in ASPIC+. In Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law: proceedings of the conference (pp. 103-112). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  5. Wieten, R., Bex, F., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2019). Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. In Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law: proceedings of the conference (pp. 143-152). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  6. 2018
  7. Prakken, H. (2018). Argument. In S. O. Hansson, & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy (pp. 63-79). (Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_2
  8. Wieten, R., Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., & Renooij, S. (2018). Exploiting causality in constructing Bayesian network graphs from legal arguments. In M. Palmirani (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2018: The Thirty-First Annual Conference (pp. 151-160). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 313). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-151
  9. Prakken, H. (2018). Historical overview of formal argumentation. In P. Baroni, D. Gabbay, M. Giacomin, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of Formal Argumentation (Vol. 1, pp. 73-141). London: College Publications.
  10. Prakken, H. (2018). Komt de robotrechter er aan? Nederlands Juristenblad, 2018(4), 269-274. [NJB 2018/207].
  11. Prakken, H., & Meester, R. (2018). Reactie op Alkemades weerwoord. Expertise en Recht, 2018(1), 41-43.
  12. 2017
  13. Prakken, H. (2017). Argument schemes for discussing Bayesian modellings of complex criminal cases. In A. Z. Wyner, & G. Casini (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2017: The Thirtieth Annual Conference (pp. 69-78). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 302). IOS Press.
  14. Prakken, H. (2017). Logics of argumentation and the law. In P. H. Glenn, & L. D. Smith (Eds.), Law and the New Logics (pp. 3-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227329.002
  15. Prakken, H. (2017). On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for Dutch law. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 241-244). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086542
  16. 2016
  17. Prakken, H. (2016). On how AI & Law can help autonomous systems obey the law: a position paper. Paper presented at AI for Justice, Den Haag, Netherlands.
  18. 2015
  19. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Constructing and Understanding Bayesian Networks for Legal Evidence with Scenario Schemes. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 128-137). New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746097
  20. Timmer, S., Meyer, J. J., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). A Structure-guided Approach to Capturing Bayesian Reasoning about Legal Evidence in Argumentation. In ICAIL '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 109-118). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746093
  21. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Capturing critical questions in Bayesian network fragments. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. : JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference (Vol. 279, pp. 173-176). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  22. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Demonstration of a Structure-guided Approach to Capturing Bayesian Reasoning about Legal Evidence in Argumentation. In ICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 233-234). New York: ACM Press Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2750370
  23. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Explaining Bayesian Networks using Argumentation. In S. Destercke, & T. Denoeux (Eds.), Explaining Bayesian Networks using Argumentation: 13th European Conference, ECSQARU 2015, Compiègne, France, July 15-17, 2015. Proceedings (pp. 83-92). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 9161). Springer.
  24. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Explaining legal Bayesian networks using support graphs. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. : JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference. (pp. 121-130). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  25. Prakken, H. (2015). Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning. In M. Araszkiewicz, & K. Pleszka (Eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking (pp. 301-321). (Legisprudence Library; Vol. 2). Springer.
  26. Prakken, H. (2015). Legal Reasoning: Computational Models. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (2 ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  27. Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2015). Representing the quality of crime scenarios in a Bayesian network. In A. Rotolo (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2015: The Twenty-eighth Annual Conference (pp. 131-140). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 279). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  28. 2014
  29. Timmer, S. T., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). A Tool for the Generation of Arguments from Bayesian Networks. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2014 (pp. 479-480). ( Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 266). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-479
  30. Timmer, S., Meyer, J-J. C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks. In R. Hoekstra (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2014: The Twenty-seventh Annual Conference (pp. 71-80). IOS Press.
  31. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2014). Extracting scenarios from a Bayesian network as explanations for legal evidence. In R. Hoekstra (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2014: The Twenty-seventh Annual Conference (pp. 103-112). IOS Press.
  32. 2013
  33. Prakken, H. (2013). Comments on Xiong and Xie. In J. van Benthem, & F. Liu (Eds.), Logic Across the University: Foundations and Application (pp. 497-501). London: College Publications.
  34. Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2013). Formalising arguments about norms. In K.D. Ashley (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Informations Systems. JURIX 2013: The Twenty-sixth Annual Conference (pp. 121-130). IOS Press.
  35. Timmer, S., Meyer, J. J., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Inference and attack in Bayesian networks. In K. Hindriks, M. De Weerdt, B. Van Riemsdijk, & M. Warnier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2013) (pp. 199-206). Delft: Delft University Press.
  36. Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian Network. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013) (pp. 150-159). New York (New York): ACM Press.
  37. Prakken, H., Atkinson, K. D., & Wyner, A. Z. (2013). Overview of Trevor Bench-Capon's research. In K. D. Atkinson, H. Prakken, & A. Z. Wyner (Eds.), From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making: A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday (pp. 1-19). London: College Publications.
Previous 1 2 3 Next

ID: 245857