Skip to ContentSkip to Navigation
University of Groningenfounded in 1614  -  top 100 university
Close
About us Practical matters How to find us prof. dr. E.C.W. (Erik) Krabbe

Publications by Erik Krabbe

1 1978 The Adequacy of Material Dialogue-Games, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19, 321-330. Reprinted in 1982b, pp. 160-169.
2. 1978a Note on a Completeness Theorem in the Theory of Counterfactuals, Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, 91-93.
3. 1978b With E.M. Barth: Formele3 dialectiek: instrumenten ter beslechting van conflicten over geuite meningen [Formal3 Dialectics: Instruments for the Resolution of Conflicts of Avowed Opinion], Spektator: tijdschrift voor neerlandistiek 7, 307-341.
4. 1981 Wat is en waarvoor dient een dialogische logica? [Dialogical Logic: What Is It and What Is It For?] In: M.F. Steehouder and C.J.M. Jansen (eds.), Taalbeheersing 1981: Lezingen op het VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres op 8, 9 en 10 september 1981 aan de Technische Hogeschool Twente, Enschede: Vereniging Interuniversitair Overleg Taalbeheersing, pp. 119-125.
5. 1982 Theory of Argumentation and the Dialectical Garb of Formal Logic. In: E.M. Barth and J.L. Martens (eds.), Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123-132.
6. 1982a Formal Dialectics as Immanent Criticism of Philosophical Systems. In: E.M. Barth and J.L. Martens (eds.), Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 233-243. Reprinted in 1982b, pp. 70-79.
7. 1982b Studies in Dialogical Logic (dissertation, Groningen University). Includes 1978, 1982a, parts from 1982e, earlier versions of 1985a and of 1986, and two papers not published elsewhere: 1982c and 1982d.
8. 1982c Essentials of the Dialogical Treatment of Quantifiers. In 1982b, pp. 249-257.
9. 1982d Permutation of Reductions in Constructive Kripke-Type Semantic Tableaux. In 1982b, pp. 258-266.
10. 1982e With E.M. Barth: From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
11. 1985 Boekbeoordeling [Review of F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger, Argumentatieleer 1: Het analyseren van een betoog, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, l983], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 7, 65-72.
12. 1985a Noncumulative Dialectical Models and Formal Dialectics, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, 129-168. An earlier version of this paper was included in 1982b, pp.177-205.
13. 1985b Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules, Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 63, 295-328.
14. 1985c Argumentatie in formele discussies [Argumentation in Formal Discussions]. In: W.K.B. Koning (ed.), Taalbeheersing in theorie en praktijk: Lezingen van het VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 28, 29 en 30 augustus 1984 aan de Katholieke Hogeschool te Tilburg, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 120-128.
15. 1986 A Theory of Modal Dialectics, Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 191-217. An earlier version of this paper was included in 1982b, pp. 206-245.
16. 1986a With D. van Dalen, J.C. Mulder and A. Visser: Finite Kripke Models of HA are Locally PA, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 528-532.
17. 1987 Naess's Dichotomy of Tenability and Relevance. In: F.H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline: Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986, Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, pp. 307-316.
18. 1987a With F.H. van Eemeren: Boekbeoordeling [Review of P.J.M.C. Schellens, Redelijke argumenten: Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers. (dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht), Dordrecht: Foris, 1985], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 9, 366-374.
19. 1988 Dialogue Sequents and Quick Proofs of Completeness. In: J.Ph. Hoepelman (ed.), Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference Workshop on Discourse Representation, Dialogue Tableaux Theory and Logic Programming, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 135-140, 174.
20. 1988a Creative Reasoning in Formal Discussion, Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 2, 483-498. Translated and revised version of 1985c.
21. 1988b Inconsistente verbintenissen: drogreden, blunder, of impasse? [Inconsistent Commitments: Fallacy, Blunder, or Quandary?] In: F.H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (eds.), Taalbeheersing in ontwikkeling: Lezingen van het VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 16, 17 en 18 december 1987 aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, pp. 49-58.
22. 1989 Why Argue? A Note on K. Lorenz: On the Reason for the Obligation to Argue. In:R. Maier (ed.), Norms in Argumentation: Proceedings of the Conference on Norms 1988, Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, pp. 27-31.
23. 1990 Inconsistent Commitments and Commitment to Inconsistencies, Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 12, 33-42. Translated and revised version of 1988b.
24. 1991 Logica en spel [Logic and Games], Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappij en wetenschap 31, 102-111.
25. 1991a With D.N. Walton: Gemakkelijk praten! Situationeel diskwalificerende aanvallen ad hominem [It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 13, 108-119.
26. 1991b Boekbeoordeling [Review of J. Woods and D. Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982, Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, 1989], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 13, 155-157.
27. 1991c Subtypes of Persuasion Dialogue and Dialectical Shifts. In: F.H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation: Organized by the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) at the University of Amsterdam: June 19-22, 1990, Amsterdam: SICSAT, pp. 371-376.
28. 1991d Quod erat demonstrandum: Wat kan en mag een argumentatietheorie zeggen over bewijzen? [QED: To What Extent Can or May a Theory of Argumentation Deal With Proofs?] In: M.M.H. Bax and W. Vuijk (eds.), Thema's in de Taalbeheersing: Lezingen van het VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 19, 20 en 21 december 1990 aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Dordrecht: ICG, pp. 8-16.
29. 1992 So What? Profiles for Relevance Criticism in Persuasion Dialogues, Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 6, 271-283.
30. 1992a Fifty entries contributed to: H. Willemsen (ed.), Woordenboek filosofie [Dictionary of Philosophy], Assen: Van Gorcum.
31. 1992b Book Review [Review of D.N. Walton, Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge U.P., 1989], Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 6, 368-373.
32. 1992c With E.M. Barth (eds.): Logic and Political Culture: Proceedings of the Colloquium 'Logic and Politics', Amsterdam, 19-22 February 1990, Amsterdam, etc.: North-Holland (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Verhandelingen, Afd. Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, deel 149).
33. 1993 Book Review [Review of J. Woods and D. Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982, Dordrecht and Providence RI: Foris, 1989], Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 6, 475-479. Translation of 1991b.
34. 1993a With Renée José Dalitz and Pier A. Smit (eds.): Empirical Logic and Public Debate: Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA: Rodopi (Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 35).
35. 1993b Reasonable Argument and Fallacies in the Kok-Stekelenburg Debate. In: Erik C.W. Krabbe, Renée José Dalitz and Pier A. Smit (eds.), Empirical Logic and Public Debate: Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA: Rodopi (Pozna ń Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 35), pp. 81-101.
36. 1993c Boekbeoordeling [Review of A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion (dissertation, University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam: SICSAT, 1992], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 15, 243-246.
37. 1994 With D.N. Walton: It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks, Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 15, 79-91. Translated and revised version of 1991a
38. 1994a Beroep op onwetendheid: Verschijningsvormen van het argumentum ad ignorantiam [Appeal to Ignorance: Varieties of the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam]. In: A. Maes et al. (eds.), Perspectieven in taalbeheersingsonderzoek: Lezingen van het zesde VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 15, 16 en 17 december 1993 aan de Provinciale Hogeschool voor Vertalers en Tolken in Gent, Dordrecht: ICG Publications, pp. 32-43.
39. 1995 Boekbeoordeling [Review of M.C. Gomperts, Neeltje Komt Dinsdag In Evakostuum: Een inleiding tot de formele logica, Amersfoort and Leuven: Acco, 1992], Mededelingen van het Wiskundig Genootschap 38, 58-59.
40. 1995a With D.N. Walton: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
41. 1995b Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy? In: Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 21-24, 1994), II: Analysis and Evaluation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 333-344.
42. 1995c Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy? In: Theo A.F. Kuipers and Anne Ruth Mackor (eds.), Cognitive Patterns in Science and Common Sense: Groningen Studies in Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Epistemology, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA: Rodopi (Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 45), pp. 151-164. Reprint of 1995b.
43. 1995d Appeal to Ignorance. In: Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park PA: Pennsylvania State U.P., 251-264. Translated and revised version of 1994a.
44. 1996 With Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (writers-in-chief), and J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, Christian Plantin, Douglas N. Walton, Charles A. Willard, John Woods, and David Zarefsky: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. 1996a Lessen in logische zelfverdediging: herwaardering filosofie in onderwijs noodzakelijk [Lessons in Logical Self-Defense: A Need for Reassessment of Philosophy in Education], NHL-krant (Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden) 9e jrg., 6 November 1996, p. 7.
46. 1996b Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy? In: Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation, Amsterdam, etc.: North-Holland (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Verhandelingen, Afd. Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, deel 170), pp. 129-141. Reprint of 1995b.
47. 1997 Wat is eigenlijk een drogreden? [What Exactly is a Fallacy?] (inaugural address, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1996).
48. 1997a With Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (writers-in-chief), and J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, Christian Plantin, Douglas N. Walton, Charles A. Willard, John Woods, and David Zarefsky: Handboek argumentatietheorie: historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen, [Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments] Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff. Translation of 1996.
49. 1997b Beroep op onwetendheid: verschijningsvormen van het argumentum ad ignorantiam [Appeal to Ignorance: Varieties of the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam]. In: Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst (eds.), Studies over argumentatie [Studies in Argumentation], Amsterdam and Meppel: Boom, pp. 216-234. Reprint of 1994a.
50. 1997c Boekbeoordeling [Review of Peter Houtlosser, Standpunten in een kritische discussie: Een pragma-dialectisch perspectief op de identificatie en de reconstructie van standpunten (dissertation, University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam: IFOTT, 1995 (Studies in Language and Language Use 22)], Taalbeheersing: driemaandelijks tijdschrift 19 (3), 281-286.
51. 1997d Lorenzen Dialogue Games: An Approach to Interpersonal Reasoning: Extended Abstract. In: Paul Dekker, Martin Stokhof and Yde Venema (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Amsterdam Colloquium: December 17-20, 1997, Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC) and the Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, pp. 19-24.
52. 1997e Arguments, Proofs, and Dialogues. In: Michael Astroh, Dietfried Gerhardus, and Gerhard Heinzmann (eds.), Dialogisches Handeln: Eine Festschrift für Kuno Lorenz, Heidelberg, Berlin, and Oxford: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, pp. 63-75. Translated and revised version of 1991d.
53. 1998 Wie is er bang voor de taalvormdrogreden? [Who is Afraid For the Fallacy of Form of Expression?] In: Huub van den Bergh, Daniël Jansen, Nanette Bertens and Mascha Damen (eds.), Taalgebruik ontrafeld: Bijdragen van het zevende VIOT-taalbeheersingscongres gehouden op 18, 19 en 20 december 1996 aan de Universiteit van Utrecht, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 29-39.
54. 1998a Dialogical Logic. In: Edward Graig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 3, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 59-62.
55. 1998b Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech? Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 12, 281-294. Translated and revised version of 1998.
56. 1998c Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech? In: Hans V. Hansen and Christopher W. Tindale, and Athena V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric (CD-ROM), ISBN 0-9683461-0-3 (Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 15-17, 1997, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario). Parallel publication of 1998b.
57. 1998d Comment on J. Anthony Blair's Paper: "The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument". In: Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, and Athena V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric (CD-ROM), ISBN 0-9683461-0-3 (Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 15-17, 1997, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario).
58. 1999 With Martin van Hees: Boekbeoordeling [Review of Andries Sarlemijn and Lambèr M.M. Royakkers, Logica: grondbeginselen en toepassingen, Assen: Van Gorcum, 1997], Nieuw archief voor wiskunde, vierde serie, 17 (1), 60-61.
59. 1999a Profiles of Dialogue. In: Jelle Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke, and Yde Venema (eds.), JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, III, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press (Vossiuspers; also on CD-ROM), pp. 25-36.
60. 1999b The Dialectic of Quasi-Logical Arguments. In: Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 16-19, 1998), Amsterdam: SIC SAT, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 464-471.
61. 2000 Dialogical Logic. In: [Edward Graig (ed.)], Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge, p. 209. Reprint of part of 1998a.
62. 2000a Boekbeoordeling [Review of B.J. (Bart) Garssen, Argumentatieschema's in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek (dissertation, University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam: IFOTT, 1997 (Studies in Language and Language Use 32)], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 22 (1), 71-74.
63. 2000b Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 14, 205-217.
64. 2000c Dialectische en retorische strategieën [Dialectical and Rhetorical Strategies]. In: Rob Neutelings, Nicole Ummelen, and Alfons Maes (eds.), Over de grenzen van de taalbeheersing: Bijdragen over taal, tekst en communicatie gepresenteerd op het VIOT-congres van december 1999 aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers, pp. 285-296.
65. 2001 The Problem of Retraction in Critical Discussion, Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 127, 141-159.
66. 2001a The Problem of Retraction in Critical Discussion. In: Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen, and Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn (CD-ROM), ISBN 0-9683461-1-1 (Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 13-15, 1999, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario). Parallel publication of 2001.
67. 2001b In Response To: Ralph H. Johnson's More on Arguers and Dialectical Obligations. In: Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen, and Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn (CD-ROM), ISBN 0-9683461-1-1 (Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 13-15, 1999, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario).
68. 2001c

With Wilfrid Hodges: Dialogue Foundations, The Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 75 (The Symposia Read at the Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and the Mind Association at the University of York July 2001), 17-49. Part I (Wilfrid Hodges): A Sceptical Look, pp. 17-32; Part II (Erik C. W. Krabbe): Dialogue Logic Restituted [title misprinted as ‘Dialogue Logic Revisited’], pp. 33-49.
69. 2002 Boekbeoordeling [Review of Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, Kritische discussie, Amsterdam: Boom, 2000], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 24 (1), 62-66.
70. 2002a Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool. In: Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat and Newport News, VA: Vale Press, pp. 153-167. Revised and expanded version of 1999a.
71. 2002b Meeting in the House of Callias: An Historical Perspective on Rhetoric and Dialectic. In: Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer (Argumentation Library 6), pp. 29-40. Revised version of 2000b.
72. 2003 Boekbeoordeling [Review of Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001], Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 25(1), 98-102.
73. 2003a

Recensie [Review of Allard M. Tamminga, Belief Dynamics: (Epistemo)logical Investigations (dissertation, University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, 2001 (ILLC Dissertation Series 2001-08)], Al-gemeen Nederlands tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte 95(2), 150-151.
74. 2003b

Metadialogues. In: Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 26-28, 2002), Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 641-644.
75. 2003c Book Review [Review of Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001] Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 17 (3), 355-359. Translation of 2003.
76. 2003d Redeneren en argumenteren [Reasoning and Arguing]. In: Martin van Hees, Else de Jonge, and Lodi Nauta (eds.), Kernthema's van de filosofie [Central Topics of Philosophy] Amsterdam: Boom, pp. 237-262.
77. 2003e Metadialogues. In: Frans H. van Eemeren. J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer (Argumentation Library 8), pp. 83-90. Reprint of 2003b.
78. 2003f

With Timothy J. Norman, Daniela V. Carbogim, and Douglas Walton: Argument and Multi-Agent Systems. In: Chris Reed and Timothy J. Norman (eds.), Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer (Argumentation Library 9), pp. 15-54.
79. 2003g De pragmatiek van deductieve zetten [The Pragmatics of Deductive Moves]. In: Luuk van Waes, Pol Cuvelier, Geert Jacobs, and Isabelle de Ridder (eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 1 [Studies in Speech Communication 1], Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 280-291.
80. 2004

Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric. In: Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications (CD-ROM), ISBN 0-9683461-2-X (Proceedings from the Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 17-19, 2001, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario). Translated and revised version of 2000c.
81. 2004a The Pragmatics of Deductive Arguments. In: J. Anthony Blair, Daniel Farr, Hans V. Hansen, Ralph H. Johnson, and Christopher W. Tindale (eds.), Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2003, ISBN 0-9683461-3-8 (Proceedings from the Informal Logic and Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, May 14-17, 2003, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario). Translated and revised version of 2003g.
82. 2004b

Commentary on: D. Godden's "Reconstruction and Representation: Deductivism as an Interpretative Strategy". In: J. Anthony Blair, Daniel Farr, Hans V. Hansen, Ralph H. Johnson, and Christopher W. Tindale (eds.), Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: OSSA, 2003, ISBN 0-9683461-3-8 (Proceedings from the Informal Logic and Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, May 14-17, 2003, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario).
83. 2004c Book Review [Review of John Woods, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences, Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2003], Philosophia mathemathica: Philosophy of Mathematics, Its Learning, and Its Applications / Philosophie des mathématiques, leurs étude et applications 12, 284-288.
84. 2005

Book Review [Review of John Woods, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences, Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2003] Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 18 (4) (2004),495-499. Reprint of 2004c.
85. 2005a Fundamental Circularities in the Theory of Argumentation. In: David Hitchcock and Daniel Farr (eds.), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 18-21 May 2005, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 286-294.
86. 2006 Dialogue Logic. In: Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic 7: Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam, etc.:Elsevier, pp. 665-704.
87. 2006a Logic and Games. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnès van Rees (eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 185-198. Translation of 1991
88. 2006b Niets dan bezwaren! [Nothing but Objections!]. In: Hans Hoeken, Berna Hendriks and Peter Jan Schellens (eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 2 [Studies in Speech Communication 1], Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 176-187.
89. 2007 With Jan Albert van Laar: About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies. Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 27, 27-58.
90. 2007a Nothing but Objections! In: Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson, Newport News, VA: Vale Press, pp.51-63, references pp. 283-299. Translation of 2006b.
91. 2007b On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage. In: Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and Bart Garssen (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 27-30, 2006),Amsterdam: Sic Sat, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, pp. 809-813.
92. 2007c Book Review [Review of James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem, Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2005]. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 21 (1) ,101-113. .
93. 2007d

Predicaments of the Concluding Stage. In: Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, and David M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: OSSA, ISBN 978-0-9683461-5-0 (Proceedings from the Seventh Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 6-9, 2007, University of Windsor).
94. 2007e Commentary on T. Govier: “Two is a Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited”. In: Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, and David M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: OSSA, ISBN 978-0-9683461-5-0 (Proceedings from the Seventh Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 6-9, 2007, University of Windsor).
95. 2007f On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 21 (3), 233-242. Reprint of 2007b.
96. 2008 Strategic Maneuvering in Mathematical Proofs.  Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 22 (3),  453-468.
97. 2008a Gelijk hebben, geven, krijgen: afscheidscollege gehouden op 15 Februari 2008 [ Being Right, Admitting that Someone is Right, Being Judged Right: Valedictory Delivered on February 15th, 2008 ]. University of Groningen. Also at  http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/314165878.
98. 2008b

Being Right , Admitting that Someone is Right, Being Judged Right: Valedictory Delivered on February 15th, 2008 .  http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/314166289. Translation of 2008a.
99. 2008c The Houtlosser Dilemma. The Amsterdam Argumentation Chronicle: Special Issue Dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956 – 2008), augustus 2008, p. 8.
100. 2008d Beth’s Impact on the Theory of Argumentation. In: Johan van Benthem, Paul van Ulsen, and Henk Visser (eds.), Logic and Scientific Philosophy: An E. W. Beth Centenary Celebration, Amsterdam: Evert Willem Beth Foundation, pp. 46-49.
101. 2008e Predicaments of the Concluding Stage. In: Cédric Dégremont, Laurent Keiff, and Helge Rückert (eds.), Dialogues, Logics and Other Strange Things: Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman. London, College Publications (Tributes 7), pp. 249-261. Reprint of 2007d.
102. 2009 On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage. In: Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds.), Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues . Springer, pp. 243-251. Reprint of 2007b.
103. 2009a Book Review [Review of Christopher W. Tindale, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2007 ]. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 23 (1), 127-131. Published on line 9 September 2008.
104. 2009b

Cooperation and Competition in Argumentative Exchanges. In: Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.), Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Beginning of the XXIst Century. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, pp. 111-126.
105. 2009c Winnen en verliezen bij het argumenteren [Winning and Losing in Argument]. In: Wilbert Spooren, Margreet Onrust and José Sanders (eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 [Studies in Speech Communication 3], Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 207-218.
106. 2010 Winning and Losing for Arguers. In: Juho Ritola (ed.), OSSA 8: Argument Cultures (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: OSSA, ISBN 978-0-920233-51-1 (Proceedings from the Eighth Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, June 3-6, 2009, University of Windsor). Translated and revised version of 2009c. With a comment by Geoffrey Goddu and a Response to My Commentator.
107. 2010a With Jan Albert van Laar: Examining the Examination Dialogue. In: Chris Reed and Christopher W. Tindale (eds.), Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argument [Tributes Series 12]. London: College Publications, pp. 31- 44, references pp. 265-289.
108. 2010b

With Jan Albert van Laar: About the Ways of Criticism. In: Chris Reed, Floriana Grasso and Nancy Green (eds.),  CMNA X: the 10th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument ( Proceedings of a workshop at the 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lisbon, August 16, 2010). Lisbon: ECAI, pp. 20-28. Earlier version of part of 2011.
109. 2010c Arne Næss (1912-2009). Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 24, 527-530. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-010-9188-1.
110. 2011 With Jan Albert van Laar: The Ways of Criticism. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 25, 199-227, DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9209-8.
111. 2011a With Douglas N. Walton: Formal Dialectical Systems and their Uses in the Study of Argumentation. In: Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Keeping in Touch With Pragma-Dialectics: In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.245-263.
112. 2011b With Jan Albert van Laar: The Ways of Criticism: Four Parameters. In: Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 29 – July 2, 2010; CD-ROM), Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat, pp. 1023-1035. Earlier version of part of 2011.
113. 2011c

Commentary on  “Strategies for Strengthening Presumptions and Generating Ethos by Manifestly Ensuring Accountability” by Fred J. Kauffeld. In: Frank Zenker (ed.), OSSA 9: Argumentation: Cognition & Community: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation: May 18-21, 2011, University of Windsor (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: University of Windsor, pp. 857-858.
114. 2011d With Jan Albert van Laar: The Burden of Criticism.  In: Frank Zenker (ed.), OSSA 9: Argumentation: Cognition & Community: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation: May 18-21, 2011, University of Windsor (CD-ROM), Windsor, ON: University of Windsor, pp. 907-923.
115. 2012 Aristotle’s On Sophistical Refutations. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy 31 (2), 243-248. DOI 10.1007/s11245-012-9124-0.
116. 2012a

With Jan Albert van Laar: The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance. Published online first in Argumentation. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-012-9272-9 . Expanded and improved version of 2011d.
117. 2012b

Formal Dialectic: From Aristotle to Pragma-Dialectics, and Beyond. In: Bart Verheij, Stefan Szeider, and Stefan Woltran (eds), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012. Amsterdam, etc.: IOS Press, pp. 11-13. Abstract of 2013.
118. 2012c Formals and Ties: Connecting Argumentation Studies With Formal Disciplines. In: Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation (proceedings of the International Colloquium: Inside Arguments ­– Logic versus Argumentation Theory, Coimbra, Portugal, 24-26 March 2011). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.169-187.
119. 2013

Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 27, 71-87. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-012-9278-3.
120. 2013a? De formalisering van kritische discussie [The Formalization of Critical Discussion]. In: Ronny Boogaart, Ton van Haaften & Henrike Jansen (eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4: Taalgebruik en diversiteit [Studies in Speech Communication 4: Use of Language and Diversity] (papers of the 12th VIOT conference “Taalgebruik en diversiteit,” University of Leiden, December 21-23, 2011). Assen: Van Gorcum. Forthcoming
121. 2013b? Arguments, Proofs, and Dialogues. In: Andrew Aberdeen and Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Springer. Reprint of 1997e. Forthcoming.
122. 2013c? Strategic Maneuvering in Mathematical Proofs. In: Andrew Aberdeen and Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Springer. Reprint of 2008. Forthcoming.
123. 2013d?

Aristotle, Over drogredenen: sofistische weerleggingen [On Fallacies: Sophistical Refutations], translated into Dutch, annotated, and introduced by Pieter Sjoerd Hasper and Erik C.W. Krabbe, Groningen: Historische uitgeverij. Forthcoming.
124. 2013e? The Formalization of Critical Discussion. Revised and expanded translation of 2013a. In preparation.



Last modified:24 June 2022 11.05 p.m.
Follow the UGfacebook twitter linkedin rss instagram youtube
Functional
Provides basic functions and uses anonymized cookies.
Standard
Provides optimal operation and uses video cookies, among others.
Complete
Provides personalized content and uses marketing cookies.
Set your cookie preferences. Read our privacy and cookie disclaimer for more information.