Publication

Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term

ten Eikelder, M. L. G., van de Meent, M. M., Mast, K., Rengerink, K. O., Jozwiak, M., de Graaf, I. M., Scholtenhuis, M. A. G. H-O., Roumen, F. J. M. E., Porath, M. M., van Loon, A. J., van den Akker, E. S., Rijnders, R. J. R., Feitsma, A. H., Adriaanse, A. H., Muller, M. A., de Leeuw, J. W., Visser, H., Woiski, M. D., Rombout-de Weerd, S., van Unnik, G. A., Pernet, P. J. M., Versendaal, H., Mol, B. W. & Bloemenkamp, K. W. M., Jan-2017, In : American Journal of Perinatology. 34, 2, p. 138-146 9 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term

    Final publisher's version, 204 KB, PDF document

    Request copy

Links

DOI

  • Mieke L. G. ten Eikelder
  • Marieke M. van de Meent
  • Kelly Mast
  • Katrien Oude Rengerink
  • Marta Jozwiak
  • Irene M. de Graaf
  • Marloes A. G. Holswilder-Olde Scholtenhuis
  • Frans J. M. E. Roumen
  • Martina M. Porath
  • Aren J. van Loon
  • Eline S. van den Akker
  • Robbert J. R. Rijnders
  • A. Hanneke Feitsma
  • Albert H. Adriaanse
  • Moira A. Muller
  • Jan W. de Leeuw
  • Harry Visser
  • Mallory D. Woiski
  • Sabina Rombout-de Weerd
  • Gijs A. van Unnik
  • Paula J. M. Pernet
  • Hans Versendaal
  • Ben W. Mol
  • Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp

Objective We assessed experience and preferences among term women undergoing induction of labor with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter.

Study Design In 18 of the 29 participating hospitals in the PROBAAT-II trial, women were asked to complete a questionnaire within 24 hours after delivery. We adapted a validated questionnaire about expectancy and experience of labor and asked women whether they would prefer the same method again in a future pregnancy.

Results The questionnaire was completed by 502 (72%) of 695 eligible women; 273 (54%) had been randomly allocated to oral misoprostol and 229 (46%) to Foley catheter. Experience of the duration of labor, pain during labor, general satisfaction with labor, and feelings of control and fear related to their expectation were comparable between both the groups. In the oral misoprostol group, 6% of the women would prefer the other method if induction is necessary in future pregnancy, versus 12% in the Foley catheter group (risk ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.90; p = 0.02).

Conclusion Women's experiences of labor after induction with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter are comparable. However, women in the Foley catheter group prefer more often to choose a different method for future inductions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-146
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume34
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2017

    Keywords

  • induction of labor, oral misoprostol, Foley catheter, patient experience, patient preference, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, PROBAAT-II, QUESTIONNAIRE

ID: 42804364