Publication

Why Women Are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators

Bongiorno, R., Langbroek, C., Bain, P. G., Ting, M. & Ryan, M. K., 1-Mar-2020, In : Psychology of Women Quarterly. 44, 1, p. 11-27 17 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Why Women Are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators

    Final publisher's version, 324 KB, PDF document

    Request copy

DOI

The #MeToo movement has highlighted the widespread problem of men’s sexual harassment of women. Women are typically reluctant to make a sexual-harassment complaint and often encounter victim-blaming attitudes when they do, especially from men. Informed by the social identity perspective, two experiments examined the influence of empathy—both for women who are sexually harassed and for male harassers—on men’s and women’s propensity to blame victims. In Study 1, university students (N = 97) responded to a vignette describing a male student’s harassment of a female student. Men blamed the victim more than women, which was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator but not lesser empathy for the female victim. Using the same vignette, Study 2 asked university students (N = 135) to take either the male perpetrator’s or the female victim’s perspective. Regardless of participant gender, participants who took the male-perpetrator’s perspective versus the female-victim’s perspective reported greater victim blame, and this was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator and lesser empathy for the female victim. Together, the findings provide evidence to suggest that male-perpetrator empathy may be equally or more important than female-victim empathy for explaining victim blame for sexual harassment. Implications for social change, including policies to limit the effects of male-perpetrator empathy when responding to sexual-harassment complaints are discussed. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684319868730.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-27
Number of pages17
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Volume44
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1-Mar-2020

    Keywords

  • empathy, victim blame, sexual harassment, GENDER-DIFFERENCES, PERSPECTIVE-TAKING, AMBIVALENT SEXISM, STIGMATIZED GROUP, SOCIAL-DOMINANCE, ATTITUDES, PERCEPTIONS, CONSEQUENCES, WORKPLACE, RAPE

ID: 118406647