When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3?

Field, S. M., Hoekstra, R., Bringmann, L. & van Ravenzwaaij, D., 30-Sep-2019, In : Collabra: Psychology. 5, 1, 15 p., 46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard



The crisis of confidence in psychology has prompted vigorous and persistent debate in the scientific community concerning the veracity of the findings of psychological experiments. This discussion has led to changes in psychology's approach to research, and several new initiatives have been developed, many with the aim of improving our findings. One key advancement is the marked increase in the number of replication studies conducted. We argue that while it is important to conduct replications as part of regular research protocol, it is neither efficient nor useful to replicate results at random. We recommend adopting a methodical approach toward the selection of replication targets to maximize the impact of the outcomes of those replications, and minimize waste of scarce resources. In the current study, we demonstrate how a Bayesian re-analysis of existing research findings followed by a simple qualitative assessment process can drive the selection of the best candidate article for replication.

Original languageEnglish
Article number46
Number of pages15
JournalCollabra: Psychology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 30-Sep-2019


  • replication, transparency, psychological science, Bayesian reanalysis, TEMPORAL LANDMARKS, BAYESIAN TESTS, SAMPLE-SIZE, REMINDERS, PSYCHOLOGY, SCIENCE, SELF, GOD

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 112162658