Publication

What do territory owners defend against?

Hinsch, M. & Komdeur, J., 22-Feb-2017, In : Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 284, 1849, 8 p., 20162356.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Hinsch, M., & Komdeur, J. (2017). What do territory owners defend against? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 284(1849), [20162356]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2356

Author

Hinsch, Martin ; Komdeur, Jan. / What do territory owners defend against?. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2017 ; Vol. 284, No. 1849.

Harvard

Hinsch, M & Komdeur, J 2017, 'What do territory owners defend against?' Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 284, no. 1849, 20162356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2356

Standard

What do territory owners defend against? / Hinsch, Martin; Komdeur, Jan.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 284, No. 1849, 20162356, 22.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Hinsch M, Komdeur J. What do territory owners defend against? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2017 Feb 22;284(1849). 20162356. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2356


BibTeX

@article{43396c85cc254b49a6b8204b7a1a584e,
title = "What do territory owners defend against?",
abstract = "Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.",
keywords = "territoriality, territory defence, resource defence, property, ownership, HAWK-DOVE GAME, MOTACILLA-ALBA, FEEDING TERRITORIALITY, POPULATION REGULATION, THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS, ASYMMETRIC CONTESTS, SEQUENTIAL-ARRIVALS, MECHANISTIC MODELS, PIED WAGTAIL, SPACE USE",
author = "Martin Hinsch and Jan Komdeur",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2016.2356",
language = "English",
volume = "284",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences",
issn = "1471-2954",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC",
number = "1849",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do territory owners defend against?

AU - Hinsch, Martin

AU - Komdeur, Jan

PY - 2017/2/22

Y1 - 2017/2/22

N2 - Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.

AB - Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.

KW - territoriality

KW - territory defence

KW - resource defence

KW - property

KW - ownership

KW - HAWK-DOVE GAME

KW - MOTACILLA-ALBA

KW - FEEDING TERRITORIALITY

KW - POPULATION REGULATION

KW - THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS

KW - ASYMMETRIC CONTESTS

KW - SEQUENTIAL-ARRIVALS

KW - MECHANISTIC MODELS

KW - PIED WAGTAIL

KW - SPACE USE

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2016.2356

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2016.2356

M3 - Review article

VL - 284

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences

SN - 1471-2954

IS - 1849

M1 - 20162356

ER -

ID: 56059754