Publication

Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system

Wagenaar, D., Tran, L. T., Meijers, A., Marmitt, G. G., Souris, K., Bolst, D., James, B., Biasi, G., Povoli, M., Kok, A., Traneus, E., van Goethem, M-J., Langendijk, J. A., Rosenfeld, A. B. & Both, S., Jan-2020, In : Physics in Medicine and Biology. 65, 2, 10 p., 025006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Wagenaar_2020_Phys._Med._Biol._65_025006

    Final publisher's version, 2 MB, PDF document

    Request copy

DOI

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is highly variable and difficult to quantify. However, RBE is related to the local ionization density, which can be related to the physical measurable dose weighted linear energy transfer (LETD). The aim of this study was to validate the LETD calculations for proton therapy beams implemented in a commercially available treatment planning system (TPS) using microdosimetry measurements and independent LETD calculations (Open-MCsquare (MCS)).

The TPS (RayStation v6R) was used to generate treatment plans on the CIRS-731-HN anthropomorphic phantom for three anatomical sites (brain, nasopharynx, neck) for a spherical target (o = 5 cm) with uniform target dose to calculate the LETD distribution. Measurements were performed at the University Medical Center Groningen proton therapy center (Proteus Plus, IBA) using a mu(+)-probe utilizing silicon on insulator microdosimeters capable of detecting lineal energies as low as 0.15 keV mu m(-1) in tissue. Dose averaged mean lineal energy depth-profiles were measured for 70 and 130 MeV spots in water and for the three treatment plans in water and an anthropomorphic phantom. The measurements were compared to the LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS independent dose calculation engine. D center dot was compared to D center dot LETD in terms of a gamma-index with a distance-to-agreement criteria of 2 mm and increasing dose difference criteria to determine the criteria for which a 90% pass rate was accomplished.

Measurements of D center dot were in good agreement with the D center dot LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS. The 90% passing rate threshold was reached at different D center dot LETD difference criteria for single spots (TPS: 1% MCS: 1%), treatment plans in water (TPS: 3% MCS: 6%) and treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom (TPS: 6% MCS: 1%).

We conclude that D center dot LETD calculations accuracy in the RayStation TPS and open MCSquare are within 6%, and sufficient for clinical D center dot LETD evaluation and optimization. These findings remove an important obstacle in the road towards clinical implementation of D center dot LETD evaluation and optimization of proton therapy treatment plans.

Original languageEnglish
Article number025006
Number of pages10
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume65
Issue number2
Early online date4-Dec-2019
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2020

    Keywords

  • microdosimetry, proton therapy, linear energy transfer (LET), relative biological effectiveness (RBE), RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS, EFFECTIVENESS RBE VALUES, PROTON-BEAM, SILICON, MODEL, MICRODOSIMETRY, TISSUE, POINT

ID: 109818997