Validation and Design Science Research in Information SystemsSol, H. G. & Gonzalez, R. A., 2012, Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems. Mora, M. (ed.). IGI Global, p. 403-426 24 p. 21
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review
Validation within design science research in Information Systems (DSRIS) is much debated. The relationship of validation to artifact evaluation is still not clear. This chapter aims at elucidating several components of DSRIS in relation to validation. The role of theory and theorizing are an important starting point, because there is no agreement as to what types of theory should be produced. Moreover, if there is a theoretical contribution, then there needs to be clear guidance as to how the designed artifact and its evaluation are related to the theory and its validation. The epistemological underpinnings of DSRIS are also open to different alternatives, including positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism, which affect the way that the validation strategy is conceived, and later on, accepted or rejected. The type of reasoning guiding a DSRIS endeavor, whether deductive, inductive, or abductive, should also be considered as it determines the fundamental logic behind any research validation. Once those choices are in place, artifact evaluation may be carried out, depending on the type of artifact and the type of technique available. Finally, the theoretical contribution may be validated from a formative (process-oriented) or summative (product-oriented) perspective.
|Title of host publication||Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems|
|Number of pages||24|
|ISBN (Print)||978-1-4666-0179-6, 1-4666-0179-5|
|Publication status||Published - 2012|