Publication

The Gettier Illusion, the Tripartite Analysis, and the Divorce Thesis

Booth, A. R., 2014, In : Erkenntnis. 79 , 3, p. 625–638

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Tripartite

    Final publisher's version, 203 KB, PDF-document

    Request copy

DOI

  • Anthony Robert Booth
Stephen Hetherington has defended the tripartite analysis of knowledge (Hetherington in Philos Q 48:453–469, 1998; J Philos 96:565–587, 1999; J Philos Res 26:307–324, 2001a; Good knowledge, bad knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001b). His defence has recently come under attack (Madison in Australas J Philos 89(1):47–58, 2011; Turri in Synthese 183(3):247–259, 2012). I critically evaluate those attacks as well as Hetherington’s newest formulation of his defence (Hetherington in Philosophia 40(3):539–547, 2012b; How to know: A practicalist conception of knowledge, Wiley, Oxford, 2011a; Ratio 24:176–191, 2011b; Syn- these 188:217–230, 2012a). I argue that his newest formulation is vulnerable to a modified version of Madison’s and Turri’s objection. However, I argue that Hetherington’s considerations lend support to a different, though also radical, thesis which can meet the objection. This thesis is what I call the Divorce thesis: the theory of epistemic justification is importantly independent of the theory of knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625–638
JournalErkenntnis
Volume79
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

  • Gettier cases, Tripartite Analysis of Knowledge, Epistemic Luck, Infallibilism

View graph of relations

ID: 15017714