Teacher evaluation through observation: Application of classroom observation and student ratings to improve teaching effectiveness in classrooms

van der Lans, R., 2017, [Groningen]: University of Groningen. 237 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 276 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 802 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 831 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 844 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 830 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 938 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 847 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 658 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 8

    Final publisher's version, 786 KB, PDF document

  • References

    Final publisher's version, 715 KB, PDF document

  • Samenvatting

    Final publisher's version, 757 KB, PDF document

  • Appendices

    Final publisher's version, 3 MB, PDF document

  • Dankwoord

    Final publisher's version, 657 KB, PDF document

  • Open brief aan de docent

    Final publisher's version, 658 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 10 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 111 KB, PDF document

  • Rikkert van der Lans
Once is not enough

Teacher evaluation is central to current policy efforts aiming to raise educational standards. In the many countries including the Netherlands England and the U.S., teacher evaluation involves classroom observation by the school principal which ideally visits his/her teachers once or twice yearly. This dissertation research suggests that visiting teachers once or twice will lead to unreliable and invalid evaluation. Once (or twice) visiting a teacher’s lesson provides observers with a “snap shot” and too few information to draw any firm conclusions concerning the teacher’s general pedagogical-didactical skill. Modest reliability requires at least four lesson visits, preferably by different observers. High reliability seems to be unachievable if using only classroom observation and most likely will require some combination of student questionnaire ratings and classroom observations. Hence, decisions which have high personal stakes (such as teacher tenure, salary and dismissal) and which require high reliability preferably should not be made based on observations made during lesson visits only.
This dissertation discusses this and other issues concerning the reliability and validity of classroom observation and student questionnaires.

For more information about the dissertation “Teacher evaluation though observation” please email Rikkert van der Lans: R.M.van.der.Lans@RUG.NL.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Award date15-May-2017
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-90-367-9683-5
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 41960551