Publication

Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S. & Pollet, T. V., Feb-2013, In : Leadership Quarterly. 24, 1, p. 159-171 13 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Tall claims

    Final publisher's version, 338 KB, PDF document

    Request copy

  • Supp1 Tall claims

    Final publisher's version, 133 KB, PDF document

    Request copy

  • Supp2 Tall claims

    Final publisher's version, 99 KB, application/vnd.ms-excel

    Request copy

DOI

According to both the scientific literature and popular media, all one needs to win a US presidential election is to be taller than one's opponent. Yet, such claims are often based on an arbitrary selection of elections, and inadequate statistical analysis. Using data on all presidential elections, we show that height is indeed an important factor in the US presidential elections. Candidates that were taller than their opponents received more popular votes, although they were not significantly more likely to win the actual election. Taller presidents were also more likely to be reelected. In addition, presidents were, on average, much taller than men from the same birth cohort. The advantage of taller candidates is potentially explained by perceptions associated with height: taller presidents are rated by experts as 'greater', and having more leadership and communication skills. We conclude that height is an important characteristic in choosing and evaluating political leaders. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-171
Number of pages13
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2013

    Keywords

  • Height, US presidents, Political outcomes, Leadership, Greatness, PERCEPTUAL-DISTORTION, AUTHORITY STATUS, UNITED-STATES, LEADERSHIP, MEN, DOMINANCE, ELECTION, SUCCESS, GENDER, WOMEN

ID: 5777832