Publication

Synergy of brushing mode and antibacterial use on in vivo biofilm formation

Jongsma, M. A., de Lagemaat, M. V., Busscher, H. J., Geertsema-Doornbusch, G. I., Atema-Smit, J., , van der Mei, H. C. & Ren, Y., Dec-2015, In : JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY. 43, 12, p. 1580-1586 7 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Synergy of brushing mode and antibacterial use on in vivo biofilm formation

    Final publisher's version, 965 KB, PDF document

DOI

Objectives: Orthodontic, multi-strand retention-wires are used as a generalized model for oral retention sites to investigate whether biofilm left-behind after powered toothbrushing in-vivo enabled better penetration of antibacterials as compared with manual brushing.

Methods: 2-cm multi-strand, stainless-steel retention-wires were placed in brackets bonded bilaterally in the upper arches of 10-volunteers. Volunteers used NaF-sodium-lauryl-sulphate-containing toothpaste and antibacterial, triclosan-containing toothpaste supplemented or not with an essential-oils containing mouthrinse. Opposite sides of the dentition including the retention-wires, were brushed manually or with a powered toothbrush. Health-care-regimens were maintained for 1-week, after which wires were removed and oral biofilm was collected.

Results: When powered toothbrushing was applied, slightly less bacteria were collected than after manual brushing, regardless whether an antibacterial-regimen was used or not. Powered-toothbrushing combined with antibacterial-regimens yielded lower biofilm viability than manual brushing, indicating better antibacterial penetration into biofilm left-behind after powered brushing. Major shifts in biofilm composition, with a decrease in prevalence of both cariogenic species and periodontopathogens, were induced after powered brushing using an antibacterial-regimen.

Conclusion: Oral biofilm left-behind after powered brushing in-vivo enabled better penetration of antibacterials than after manual brushing.

Clinical significance: Mechanical removal of oral biofilm is important for prevention of dental pathologies, but biofilm is always left-behind, such as in fissures, buccal pits, interproximal areas and gingival margins and around orthodontic appliances. Use of antibacterial toothpastes or mouthrinses can contribute to removal or killing of biofilm bacteria, but biofilm structure hampers antibacterial penetration. A synergy between brushing mode and antibacterial-regimen applied exists with clinically demonstrable effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1580-1586
Number of pages7
JournalJOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume43
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2015

    Keywords

  • Biofilm, Powered brushing, Manual brushing, Antibacterials, GRADIENT GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS, DENTAL PLAQUE, ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT, ADHESION FORCES, ORAL BIOFILMS, ESSENTIAL OIL, MOUTHRINSE, GINGIVITIS, REMOVAL, HEALTH

ID: 24183064