Publication
Sustainability Choices when Cooking Pasta
Fiorini, L., Steg, L. & Aiello, M., 12-Jun-2020, p. 161-166. 6 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Academic

Documents
- Sustainability Choices when Cooking Pasta
Final publisher's version, 470 KB, PDF document
DOI
Everyday activities requiring electrical or thermal power imply sustainability
decisions. Choices for different energy sources, which
equipment to use, and the timing of activities have major implications
for CO2 emissions. Being aware of each of them and accounting
for their impact is nearly impossible. First, it is unclear how to
assess the sustainability footprint of a decision; second, the complexity
of the implications of all such decisions is overwhelming.
To make things more concrete, we consider a simple as well as common
task: cooking a dish of pasta. We measure the sustainability of
the decisions involved in terms of CO2 emissions and we use historical
data of German CO2-emission intensity calculated with both
the average method and the marginal one. We find that starting
from hot or cold tap water can imply up to 35% difference in emissions,
depending on the timing and the chosen equipment. However,
the complexity and size of information involved in such sustainability
choices require the adoption of digitalized and automated
systems, which, in turn, raises questions about user acceptability
and (mis)trust in such technologies.
decisions. Choices for different energy sources, which
equipment to use, and the timing of activities have major implications
for CO2 emissions. Being aware of each of them and accounting
for their impact is nearly impossible. First, it is unclear how to
assess the sustainability footprint of a decision; second, the complexity
of the implications of all such decisions is overwhelming.
To make things more concrete, we consider a simple as well as common
task: cooking a dish of pasta. We measure the sustainability of
the decisions involved in terms of CO2 emissions and we use historical
data of German CO2-emission intensity calculated with both
the average method and the marginal one. We find that starting
from hot or cold tap water can imply up to 35% difference in emissions,
depending on the timing and the chosen equipment. However,
the complexity and size of information involved in such sustainability
choices require the adoption of digitalized and automated
systems, which, in turn, raises questions about user acceptability
and (mis)trust in such technologies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 161-166 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 12-Jun-2020 |
Event | The Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems (ACM e-Energy) - Melbourne, Australia, Melbourne, Australia Duration: 22-Jun-2020 → 26-Jun-2020 |
Conference
Conference | The Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems (ACM e-Energy) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ACM e-Energy 2020 |
Country | Australia |
City | Melbourne |
Period | 22/06/2020 → 26/06/2020 |
Event
The Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems (ACM e-Energy)
22/06/2020 → 26/06/2020
Melbourne, AustraliaEvent: Conference
- Carbon emissions, Marginal method, Sustainability, Complexity, Automation
Keywords
ID: 123225467