Similar but different: Implications for the one versus many functional somatic syndromes discussion

Joustra, M. L., 2019, [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 141 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 350 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 596 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 549 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 592 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 715 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 693 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 641 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 733 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 8

    Final publisher's version, 555 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 9

    Final publisher's version, 878 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 10

    Final publisher's version, 506 KB, PDF document

  • Summary

    Final publisher's version, 411 KB, PDF document

  • Nederlandse Samenvatting

    Final publisher's version, 414 KB, PDF document

  • Dankwoord

    Final publisher's version, 605 KB, PDF document

  • About the Author

    Final publisher's version, 207 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 7.53 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 435 KB, PDF document

The aim of this thesis was to investigate the validity and meaning of functional somatic syndrome (FSS) diagnoses, and to examine to which degree these diagnoses are able to identify separate groups of patients in the context of the lumper-splitter discussion. We approached this aim from different angles, taking into account the possible etiological pathways that may lead to the causation and persistence of FSS. We found that the case definitions of FSS overlap, and that patients with one FSS frequently meet diagnostic criteria of the other FSS. We reveal that the diagnostic overlap substantially increases when FSS are more serious and chronic in nature. Furthermore, psychiatric co-morbidity and reduced physical activity were characteristics of all FSS. However, we describe also remarkable differences in case definitions that might artificially decrease presumed overlap between FSS. We argue that the findings that FSS share non-symptom characteristics and that they respond to the same therapies, are not unique to FSS patients, and that it therefore is no reason to consider them similar. So, this thesis reveals that, although there is overlap in case definitions and psychiatric comorbidity, the differences between the FSS cannot be ignored. These results support recent suggestions that FSS have both specific and general characteristics. We therefore state that FSS may reflect the same underlying syndrome with different subtypes. This underlying syndrome should be more extensively investigated in the future to establish a valid and generally accepted diagnostic criteria across medical specialties.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Award date30-Jan-2019
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-94-034-1267-2
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-1266-5
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 73838134