Sensitive Survey Questions: Measuring Attitudes Regarding Female Genital Cutting Through a List ExperimentDe Cao, E. & Lutz, C., Oct-2018, In : Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 80, 5, p. 871-892 22 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Potential bias in survey responses is higher if sensitive outcomes are measured. This study analyses attitudes towards female genital cutting (FGC) in Ethiopia. A list experiment is designed to elicit truthful answers about FGC support and compares these outcomes with the answers given to a direct question. Our results confirm that the average bias is substantial as answers to direct questions underestimate the FGC support by about 10 percentage points. Moreover, our results provide suggestive but not statistically significant evidence that this bias is more pronounced among uneducated women and women targeted by an NGO intervention (not randomly assigned).
|Number of pages||22|
|Journal||Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics|
|Early online date||11-Jan-2018|
|Publication status||Published - Oct-2018|
- STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS, COUNT TECHNIQUE, BEHAVIOR, BIAS