Publication

Reconciliation, Incarnation, and Headless Hegelianism

Vanden Auweele, D., 1-Apr-2017, In : Faith and Philosophy. 34, 2, p. 201-222 21 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Reconciliation, Incarnation, and Headless Hegelianism

    Final publisher's version, 341 KB, PDF document

    Request copy

DOI

  • Dennis Vanden Auweele
A number of contemporary authors (e.g., Catherine Malabou, Slavoj Žižek, and John Caputo) claim that Hegel’s Religionsphilosophie provides important insights for contemporary philosophy of religion. John Caputo argues that Hegel’s notion of incarnation as radical kenosis is a powerful tool for postmodern Radical Theology. In this essay, I scrutinize this claim by balancing Hegel’s notion of incarnation with his notion of recognition—the latter of which Caputo removes from a “headless Hegelianism.” I argue that a non-Hegelian, non-dialectic sense of recognition ought to be introduced in contemporary philosophy of religion to remove the confrontation with the Other from the realm of radical trauma.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-222
Number of pages21
JournalFaith and Philosophy
Volume34
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1-Apr-2017

    Keywords

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831, Caputo, John D, 1940-, Malabou, Catherine, Žižek, Slavoj, Habermas, Jürgen, Jesus Christ -- Kenosis, Philosophy and religion, Radical theology, Incarnation, Peer reviewed

ID: 41893745