Publication

Ultrasound stimulation of mandibular bone defect healing

Schortinghuis, J., 2004, s.n.. 161 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • titlecon.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 133 KB, PDF-document

  • c1.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF-document

  • c2.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 276 KB, PDF-document

  • c3.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF-document

  • c4.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 3 MB, PDF-document

  • c5.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF-document

  • c6.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 163 KB, PDF-document

  • appendix.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 280 KB, PDF-document

  • dankwoord.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 52 KB, PDF-document

  • samenvat.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 144 KB, PDF-document

  • summary.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 142 KB, PDF-document

  • thesis.pdf

    Final publisher's version, 7 MB, PDF-document

  • Jurjen Schortinghuis
The conclusions of the experimental work presented in this thesis are: 1. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound is not effective in stimulating bone growth into a rat mandibular defect, either with or without the use of osteoconductive membranes. 2. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound does not seem to have an effect on the early bone formation in the vertically distracted, severely resorbed mandible. This thesis focused on a small area in the field of ultrasound and bone healing that had not been explored before. The animal experimental work indicates that ultrasound does not stimulate mandibular bone defect healing with or without the use of osteoconductive membranes in healthy animals. This may be related to the ultrasound field variables used, to an optimal healing tendency of the head and neck region, or to limitations of the animal model. To reveal which of these possibilities is the most plausible, additional research is needed. For now, it is not recommendable to apply ultrasound in maxillofacial surgery to stimulate bone defect healing. In situations where mechanical loading or blood perfusion is limited, as for example in the case of mandibular fractures or osteoradionecrosis, ultrasound might have an effect. More importantly, unravelling the mechanism of action as to how ultrasound stimulates bone healing in certain cases may eventually predict if, and if so, when, ultrasound may be of value in maxillofacial surgery.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Publisher
Print ISBNs9036720400
Publication statusPublished - 2004

View graph of relations

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 2982326