Process Evaluation of a Workers' Health Surveillance Program for Meat Processing Workersvan Holland, B., Brouwer, S., de Boer, M. R., Reneman, M. F. & Soer, R., Sep-2017, In : Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 27, 3, p. 307-318 12 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Objective To evaluate the implementation process of a workers' health surveillance (WHS) program in a Dutch meat processing company. Methods Workers from five plants were eligible to participate in the WHS program. The program consisted of four evaluative components and an intervention component. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to evaluate seven process aspects. Data were gathered by interviews with stakeholders, participant questionnaires, and from registries of the company and occupational health service. Results Two recruitment strategies were used: open invitation or automatic participation. Of the 986 eligible workers, 305 participated in the program. Average reach was 53 %. Two out of five program components could not be assessed on dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. If components were assessable, 85-100 % of the components was delivered, 66-100 % of the components was received by participants, and fidelity was 100 %. Participants were satisfied with the WHS program (mean score 7.6). Contextual factors that facilitated implementation were among others societal developments and management support. Factors that formed barriers were program novelty and delayed follow-up. Conclusion The WHS program was well received by participants. Not all participants were offered the same number of program components, and not all components were performed according to protocol. Deviation from protocol is an indication of program failure and may affect program effectiveness.
|Number of pages||12|
|Journal||Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation|
|Early online date||30-Jul-2016|
|Publication status||Published - Sep-2017|
- Implementation research, Meatpacking industry, Sustainable employability, Quantitative, Qualitative, INTERVENTION