Publication

Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: The SLIM study

Roumen, C., Feskens, E. J. M., Corpeleijn, E., Mensink, M., Saris, W. H. M. & Blaak, E. E., 2011, In : European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 65, p. 1141-1147 7 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Roumen, C., Feskens, E. J. M., Corpeleijn, E., Mensink, M., Saris, W. H. M., & Blaak, E. E. (2011). Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: The SLIM study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 65, 1141-1147. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.74

Author

Roumen, C ; Feskens, E J M ; Corpeleijn, E ; Mensink, M ; Saris, W H M ; Blaak, E E. / Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout : The SLIM study. In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011 ; Vol. 65. pp. 1141-1147.

Harvard

Roumen, C, Feskens, EJM, Corpeleijn, E, Mensink, M, Saris, WHM & Blaak, EE 2011, 'Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: The SLIM study', European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 65, pp. 1141-1147. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.74

Standard

Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout : The SLIM study. / Roumen, C; Feskens, E J M; Corpeleijn, E; Mensink, M; Saris, W H M; Blaak, E E.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 65, 2011, p. 1141-1147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Roumen C, Feskens EJM, Corpeleijn E, Mensink M, Saris WHM, Blaak EE. Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: The SLIM study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;65:1141-1147. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.74


BibTeX

@article{97cf86b66ffd4d4792f89abc62420e04,
title = "Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout: The SLIM study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a 4.1-year (range 3-6 years) lifestyle intervention according to general public health recommendations on glucose tolerance and dropout in a Dutch population with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).SUBJECTS/METHODS: In the Study on Lifestyle intervention and Impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht, 147 Caucasian IGT subjects were randomized to an intervention group (INT: n=74; 38 male, 36 female) and control group (CON: n=73; 37 male, 36 female). Annually, subjects underwent measurements of body weight, anthropometry, glucose tolerance (oral glucose tolerance test), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance), maximal aerobic capacity (VO(2) max), blood lipids and blood pressure. INT received individual advice regarding a healthy diet and physical activity.RESULTS: INT decreased their saturated fat intake, increased their carbohydrate intake (P<0.05) and VO(2) max (P=0.04) compared with CON. Body weight did not change significantly (P=0.20) between the groups. After an initial decrease, 2-h glucose levels overall increased in INT (+0.11 mmol/l), but significantly less than CON (+1.18 mmol/l; P=0.04). Diabetes incidence was lower in INT versus CON (30 versus 56{\%}, P=0.04). Change in body weight was associated with change in 2-h glucose levels (β=0.399 mmol/l per kg, P=0.02). Dropouts had a lower aerobic fitness and socioeconomic status, and a higher body mass index (BMI) and 2-h glucose compared with non-dropouts.CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged feasible changes in diet and physical activity prevent deterioration of glucose tolerance and reduce diabetes risk. Low socioeconomic status, low aerobic fitness and high BMI and 2-h glucose are indicative of dropout to the program.",
keywords = "Aged, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Body Mass Index, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Intake, Female, Food, Organic, Glucose Intolerance, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Life Style, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Netherlands, Patient Dropouts, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "C Roumen and Feskens, {E J M} and E Corpeleijn and M Mensink and Saris, {W H M} and Blaak, {E E}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1038/ejcn.2011.74",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1141--1147",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of lifestyle intervention outcome and dropout

T2 - The SLIM study

AU - Roumen, C

AU - Feskens, E J M

AU - Corpeleijn, E

AU - Mensink, M

AU - Saris, W H M

AU - Blaak, E E

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a 4.1-year (range 3-6 years) lifestyle intervention according to general public health recommendations on glucose tolerance and dropout in a Dutch population with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).SUBJECTS/METHODS: In the Study on Lifestyle intervention and Impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht, 147 Caucasian IGT subjects were randomized to an intervention group (INT: n=74; 38 male, 36 female) and control group (CON: n=73; 37 male, 36 female). Annually, subjects underwent measurements of body weight, anthropometry, glucose tolerance (oral glucose tolerance test), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance), maximal aerobic capacity (VO(2) max), blood lipids and blood pressure. INT received individual advice regarding a healthy diet and physical activity.RESULTS: INT decreased their saturated fat intake, increased their carbohydrate intake (P<0.05) and VO(2) max (P=0.04) compared with CON. Body weight did not change significantly (P=0.20) between the groups. After an initial decrease, 2-h glucose levels overall increased in INT (+0.11 mmol/l), but significantly less than CON (+1.18 mmol/l; P=0.04). Diabetes incidence was lower in INT versus CON (30 versus 56%, P=0.04). Change in body weight was associated with change in 2-h glucose levels (β=0.399 mmol/l per kg, P=0.02). Dropouts had a lower aerobic fitness and socioeconomic status, and a higher body mass index (BMI) and 2-h glucose compared with non-dropouts.CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged feasible changes in diet and physical activity prevent deterioration of glucose tolerance and reduce diabetes risk. Low socioeconomic status, low aerobic fitness and high BMI and 2-h glucose are indicative of dropout to the program.

AB - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a 4.1-year (range 3-6 years) lifestyle intervention according to general public health recommendations on glucose tolerance and dropout in a Dutch population with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).SUBJECTS/METHODS: In the Study on Lifestyle intervention and Impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht, 147 Caucasian IGT subjects were randomized to an intervention group (INT: n=74; 38 male, 36 female) and control group (CON: n=73; 37 male, 36 female). Annually, subjects underwent measurements of body weight, anthropometry, glucose tolerance (oral glucose tolerance test), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance), maximal aerobic capacity (VO(2) max), blood lipids and blood pressure. INT received individual advice regarding a healthy diet and physical activity.RESULTS: INT decreased their saturated fat intake, increased their carbohydrate intake (P<0.05) and VO(2) max (P=0.04) compared with CON. Body weight did not change significantly (P=0.20) between the groups. After an initial decrease, 2-h glucose levels overall increased in INT (+0.11 mmol/l), but significantly less than CON (+1.18 mmol/l; P=0.04). Diabetes incidence was lower in INT versus CON (30 versus 56%, P=0.04). Change in body weight was associated with change in 2-h glucose levels (β=0.399 mmol/l per kg, P=0.02). Dropouts had a lower aerobic fitness and socioeconomic status, and a higher body mass index (BMI) and 2-h glucose compared with non-dropouts.CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged feasible changes in diet and physical activity prevent deterioration of glucose tolerance and reduce diabetes risk. Low socioeconomic status, low aerobic fitness and high BMI and 2-h glucose are indicative of dropout to the program.

KW - Aged

KW - Blood Glucose

KW - Blood Pressure

KW - Body Composition

KW - Body Mass Index

KW - Body Weight

KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

KW - Diet

KW - Dietary Carbohydrates

KW - Energy Intake

KW - Female

KW - Food, Organic

KW - Glucose Intolerance

KW - Glucose Tolerance Test

KW - Humans

KW - Life Style

KW - Lipids

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Motor Activity

KW - Netherlands

KW - Patient Dropouts

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Socioeconomic Factors

KW - Journal Article

KW - Randomized Controlled Trial

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1038/ejcn.2011.74

DO - 10.1038/ejcn.2011.74

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1141

EP - 1147

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

ER -

ID: 48411615