Perspective shift increases processing effort of pronouns: a comparison between direct and indirect speechKöder, F., Maier, E. & Hendriks, P., 2015, In : Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 30, 8, p. 940-946 7 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
This study investigates the processing of deictic pronouns in two types of speech reports, direct speech (Elephant said: “I get the football”) and indirect speech (Elephant said that I get the football). According to Hypothesis 1, pronoun processing in direct speech is more demanding because it requires a perspective shift from the actual to the original speaker. Hypothesis 2 suggests the opposite, based on a previous study that found a positive effect of direct speech on discourse comprehension. In a referent selection task, 116 native speakers of Dutch identified the referents of first-, second- and third-person pronouns in direct and indirect speech. We found higher error rates and longer decision times for pronoun interpretation in direct speech, confirming Hypothesis 1. Furthermore, accuracy depended on the pronoun (most mistakes for he). We discuss how our results can be reconciled with seemingly conflicting evidence that suggests a processing advantage for direct speech.
|Number of pages||7|
|Journal||Language, Cognition and Neuroscience|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|
- direct speech, indirect speech, personal pronoun, perspective shift, deixis