Obstacles to linking emissions trading systems in the EU and China: A comparative law and economics perspective

Zeng, Y., 2018, [Groningen]: University of Groningen. 253 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 127 KB, PDF document

  • Acknowledgements

    Final publisher's version, 81 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 154 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 135 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 197 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 159 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 187 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 306 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 122 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 8

    Final publisher's version, 529 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 9

    Final publisher's version, 119 KB, PDF document

  • Appendices

    Final publisher's version, 234 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 79 KB, PDF document

  • Yingying Zeng
With the U.S. retreat on climate efforts, EU officials are already looking to China, expecting an ‘expanded carbon market’ to reinforce EU’s global climate leadership. Meanwhile, China has shown growing interests in gaining a more prominent role in the global climate governance, and linking the China Emissions Trading System (ETS) to the world’s first ETS will largely serve that goal. Admittedly, linking the China ETS to the EU ETS could bring considerable economic, environmental and political gains. But linking is by no means a plain sailing process, and even more so when it comes to the two largest ETSs in the world with notable differences and varied policy priorities. The current linking literature focuses on mapping barriers in general and has not yet focused on EU and China, let alone the intricacies of policy designs. Given the gap in the literature and political interest expressed, this dissertation seeks to enrich the scientific and policy discussions by identifying obstacles to an EU-China linkage. Specifically, applying a Comparative Law & Economics Approach, the study set out to examine the current carbon regulatory framework in both jurisdictions. It further identified key concerns for a future link, including the heterogeneity of system designs (e.g. cap setting) and differences in the carbon regulatory features (e.g. ETS enforcement). In response, this dissertation proposes solutions for facilitating the link and discusses how the findings can assist the decision-making on crucial questions that ought to be posed in the first place: whether, when and how to link.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Award date6-Dec-2018
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-94-034-1225-2
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-1224-5
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 71581359