Publication

No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?

Zijlstra, W. P., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Zee, M. J. M. & van Raay, J. J. A. M., Dec-2011, In : INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. 35, 12, p. 1771-6 6 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Zijlstra, W. P., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Zee, M. J. M., & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2011). No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 35(12), 1771-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7

Author

Zijlstra, Wierd P ; van den Akker-Scheek, Inge ; Zee, Mark J M ; van Raay, Jos J A M. / No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?. In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 12. pp. 1771-6.

Harvard

Zijlstra, WP, van den Akker-Scheek, I, Zee, MJM & van Raay, JJAM 2011, 'No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?', INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1771-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7

Standard

No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? / Zijlstra, Wierd P; van den Akker-Scheek, Inge; Zee, Mark J M; van Raay, Jos J A M.

In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, Vol. 35, No. 12, 12.2011, p. 1771-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Zijlstra WP, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zee MJM, van Raay JJAM. No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. 2011 Dec;35(12):1771-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7


BibTeX

@article{d3bcb5b3c7e6436681b56df7f6828026,
title = "No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We aimed to test the claim of greater range of motion (ROM) with large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.METHODS: We compared 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene (MP) total hip arthroplasty with large femoral head metal-on-metal (MM) total hip arthroplasty in a randomised clinical trial. ROM one year postoperatively was determined in 50 patients. Mean head sizes were 28 mm (MP) and 48 mm (MM).RESULTS: After one year, the large head MM group showed greater improvement in internal rotation (14 degrees) than the 28 mm group (seven degrees).There were no significant differences in the absolute values of postoperative internal rotation, external rotation, flexion, extension, abduction and abduction.CONCLUSIONS: Absolute postoperative range of motion did not differ between the two groups. The improvement in internal rotation was greater after large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. It is however questionable whether this difference is clinically relevant.",
keywords = "Aged, Arthritis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Bone Malalignment, Female, Femur Head, Femur Head Necrosis, Health Status, Hip Injuries, Hip Joint, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Metals, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Polyethylene, Prosthesis Design, Range of Motion, Articular, Recovery of Function, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Zijlstra, {Wierd P} and {van den Akker-Scheek}, Inge and Zee, {Mark J M} and {van Raay}, {Jos J A M}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1771--6",
journal = "INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "SPRINGER",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?

AU - Zijlstra, Wierd P

AU - van den Akker-Scheek, Inge

AU - Zee, Mark J M

AU - van Raay, Jos J A M

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - PURPOSE: We aimed to test the claim of greater range of motion (ROM) with large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.METHODS: We compared 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene (MP) total hip arthroplasty with large femoral head metal-on-metal (MM) total hip arthroplasty in a randomised clinical trial. ROM one year postoperatively was determined in 50 patients. Mean head sizes were 28 mm (MP) and 48 mm (MM).RESULTS: After one year, the large head MM group showed greater improvement in internal rotation (14 degrees) than the 28 mm group (seven degrees).There were no significant differences in the absolute values of postoperative internal rotation, external rotation, flexion, extension, abduction and abduction.CONCLUSIONS: Absolute postoperative range of motion did not differ between the two groups. The improvement in internal rotation was greater after large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. It is however questionable whether this difference is clinically relevant.

AB - PURPOSE: We aimed to test the claim of greater range of motion (ROM) with large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.METHODS: We compared 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene (MP) total hip arthroplasty with large femoral head metal-on-metal (MM) total hip arthroplasty in a randomised clinical trial. ROM one year postoperatively was determined in 50 patients. Mean head sizes were 28 mm (MP) and 48 mm (MM).RESULTS: After one year, the large head MM group showed greater improvement in internal rotation (14 degrees) than the 28 mm group (seven degrees).There were no significant differences in the absolute values of postoperative internal rotation, external rotation, flexion, extension, abduction and abduction.CONCLUSIONS: Absolute postoperative range of motion did not differ between the two groups. The improvement in internal rotation was greater after large femoral head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. It is however questionable whether this difference is clinically relevant.

KW - Aged

KW - Arthritis

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

KW - Bone Malalignment

KW - Female

KW - Femur Head

KW - Femur Head Necrosis

KW - Health Status

KW - Hip Injuries

KW - Hip Joint

KW - Hip Prosthesis

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Metals

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Osteoarthritis, Hip

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Polyethylene

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Range of Motion, Articular

KW - Recovery of Function

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7

DO - 10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1771

EP - 1776

JO - INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

JF - INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 14212807