New rules, new tools: Predicting academic achievement in college admissions

Niessen, A. S. M., 2018, [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 237 p.

Research output: ThesisThesis fully internal (DIV)Academic

Copy link to clipboard


  • Title and contents

    Final publisher's version, 156 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 1

    Final publisher's version, 329 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 2

    Final publisher's version, 529 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 3

    Final publisher's version, 748 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 4

    Final publisher's version, 581 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 5

    Final publisher's version, 534 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 6

    Final publisher's version, 610 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 7

    Final publisher's version, 394 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 8

    Final publisher's version, 333 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 9

    Final publisher's version, 620 KB, PDF document

  • Chapter 10

    Final publisher's version, 836 KB, PDF document

  • Appendices

    Final publisher's version, 738 KB, PDF document

  • Complete thesis

    Final publisher's version, 3 MB, PDF document

  • Propositions

    Final publisher's version, 217 KB, PDF document

Admission procedures for higher education aim to assess the fit between students and programs through selection or matching procedures. Just as in personnel selection, decisions are commonly made based on intuition and often lack scientific support. So, the central question in this thesis was: How should we select students?

I showed that:
(1) Using questionnaires to measure personality and motivation does not work in selection, because of socially-desirable responding by the applicants. I conclude that motivation and personality are very difficult to measure in selection contexts and that no solution is available yet.
(2) The best method to select students is to give them tasks that are highly similar to what they would have to do in the study program they apply to, also referred to as curriculum sampling. Curriculum samples predicted academic achievement well, and provide applicants with insight into their fit to the program. In addition, applicants appreciated the use of curriculum samples, while the use of lottery and high school grades was not appreciated.
(3) However, even if valid methods are used, the effects of selection on study performance are small when most applicants are suitable and few are rejected, as is the case for most Dutch higher education programs.

A major challenge in establishing effective and fair selection decisions in education and in organizations is to overcome the reliance on intuitions and gut feelings; Scientific knowledge based on selection psychology should be utilized in practice much more.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
Award date15-Feb-2018
Place of Publication[Groningen]
Print ISBNs978-94-034-0385-4
Electronic ISBNs978-94-034-0384-7
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 53215605