Publication

Minimal important change and minimal detectable change in activities of daily living in community-living older people

Suijker, J. J., van Rijn, M., ter Riet, G., van Charante, E. P. M., De Rooij, S. E. & Buurman, B. M., Feb-2017, In : The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 21, 2, p. 165-172 8 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Minimal important change and minimal detectable change in activities

    Final publisher's version, 220 KB, PDF document

DOI

  • Jacqueline J. Suijker
  • M van Rijn
  • G. ter Riet
  • E. P. Moll van Charante
  • S. E. De Rooij
  • Bianca M. Buurman

To estimate the minimal important change (MIC) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Katz-activities of daily living (ADL) index score and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale.

Data from a cluster-randomized clinical trial and a cohort study.

General practices in the Netherlands.

3184 trial participants and 51 participants of the cohort study with a mean age of 80.1 (SD 6.4) years.

At baseline and after 6 months, the Katz-ADL index score (0-6 points), the Lawton IADL scale (0-7 points), and self-perceived decline in (I)ADL were assessed using a self-reporting questionnaire. MIC was assessed using anchor-based methods: the (relative) mean change score; and using distributional methods: the effect size (ES), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and 0.5 SD. The MDC was estimated using SEM, based on a test-retest study (2-week interval) and on the anchor-based method.

Anchor-based MICs of the Katz-ADL index score were 0.47 points, while distributional MICs ranged from 0.18 to 0.47 points. Similarly, anchor-based MICs of the Lawton IADL scale were between 0.31 and 0.54 points and distributional MICs ranged from 0.31 to 0.77 points. The MDC varies by sample size. For the MIC to exceed the MDC at least 482 patients are needed.

The MIC of both the Katz-ADL index and the Lawton IADL scale lie around half a point. The certainty of this conclusion is reduced by the variation across calculational methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-172
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging
Volume21
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2017

    Keywords

  • Elderly, activities of daily living, minimal important change, patient reported outcome, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, HEALTH-STATUS QUESTIONNAIRES, MEANINGFUL CHANGE, DISABILITY, RESPONSIVENESS, PERFORMANCE, ADULTS, POPULATIONS, DIFFERENCE, OUTCOMES

View graph of relations

ID: 44379381