Publication

Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review

Geurts, M. M. E., Talsma, J., Brouwers, J. R. B. J. & de Gier, J. J., Jul-2012, In : British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 74, 1, p. 16-33 18 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Geurts, M. M. E., Talsma, J., Brouwers, J. R. B. J., & de Gier, J. J. (2012). Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x

Author

Geurts, Marlies M. E. ; Talsma, Jaap ; Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J. ; de Gier, Johan J. / Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient : a systematic review. In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2012 ; Vol. 74, No. 1. pp. 16-33.

Harvard

Geurts, MME, Talsma, J, Brouwers, JRBJ & de Gier, JJ 2012, 'Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review', British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x

Standard

Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient : a systematic review. / Geurts, Marlies M. E.; Talsma, Jaap; Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.; de Gier, Johan J.

In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 74, No. 1, 07.2012, p. 16-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Geurts MME, Talsma J, Brouwers JRBJ, de Gier JJ. Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2012 Jul;74(1):16-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x


BibTeX

@article{98b3115cec4441e892f51846820c2996,
title = "Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review",
abstract = "This article systematically reviews the literature on the impact of collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners and describes its effect on patients' health. A systematic literature search provided 1041 articles. After first review of title and abstract, 152 articles remained. After review of the full text, 83 articles were included. All included articles are presented according to the following variables: (i) reference; (ii) design and setting of the study; (iii) inclusion criteria for patients; (iv) description of the intervention; (v) whether a patient interview was performed to involve patients' experiences with their medicine-taking behaviour; (vi) outcome; (vii) whether healthcare professionals received additional training; and (viii) whether healthcare professionals received financial reimbursement. Many different interventions are described where pharmacists and general practitioners work together to improve patients' health. Only nine studies reported hard outcomes, such as hospital (re)admissions; however, these studies had different results, not all of which were statistically significant. Randomized controlled trials should be able to describe hard outcomes, but large patient groups will be needed to perform such studies. Patient involvement is important for long-term success.",
keywords = "family physician, interprofessional relations, patient care, pharmaceutical care, pharmaceutical services, pharmacist, RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL, DRUG-RELATED PROBLEMS, NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS, PRIMARY-CARE, PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, COMMUNITY PHARMACY, ELDERLY-PATIENTS, OLDER-PEOPLE, CLINICAL PHARMACISTS, MANAGEMENT REVIEWS",
author = "Geurts, {Marlies M. E.} and Jaap Talsma and Brouwers, {Jacobus R. B. J.} and {de Gier}, {Johan J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "16--33",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0306-5251",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Geurts, Marlies M. E.

AU - Talsma, Jaap

AU - Brouwers, Jacobus R. B. J.

AU - de Gier, Johan J.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - This article systematically reviews the literature on the impact of collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners and describes its effect on patients' health. A systematic literature search provided 1041 articles. After first review of title and abstract, 152 articles remained. After review of the full text, 83 articles were included. All included articles are presented according to the following variables: (i) reference; (ii) design and setting of the study; (iii) inclusion criteria for patients; (iv) description of the intervention; (v) whether a patient interview was performed to involve patients' experiences with their medicine-taking behaviour; (vi) outcome; (vii) whether healthcare professionals received additional training; and (viii) whether healthcare professionals received financial reimbursement. Many different interventions are described where pharmacists and general practitioners work together to improve patients' health. Only nine studies reported hard outcomes, such as hospital (re)admissions; however, these studies had different results, not all of which were statistically significant. Randomized controlled trials should be able to describe hard outcomes, but large patient groups will be needed to perform such studies. Patient involvement is important for long-term success.

AB - This article systematically reviews the literature on the impact of collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners and describes its effect on patients' health. A systematic literature search provided 1041 articles. After first review of title and abstract, 152 articles remained. After review of the full text, 83 articles were included. All included articles are presented according to the following variables: (i) reference; (ii) design and setting of the study; (iii) inclusion criteria for patients; (iv) description of the intervention; (v) whether a patient interview was performed to involve patients' experiences with their medicine-taking behaviour; (vi) outcome; (vii) whether healthcare professionals received additional training; and (viii) whether healthcare professionals received financial reimbursement. Many different interventions are described where pharmacists and general practitioners work together to improve patients' health. Only nine studies reported hard outcomes, such as hospital (re)admissions; however, these studies had different results, not all of which were statistically significant. Randomized controlled trials should be able to describe hard outcomes, but large patient groups will be needed to perform such studies. Patient involvement is important for long-term success.

KW - family physician

KW - interprofessional relations

KW - patient care

KW - pharmaceutical care

KW - pharmaceutical services

KW - pharmacist

KW - RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL

KW - DRUG-RELATED PROBLEMS

KW - NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS

KW - PRIMARY-CARE

KW - PHARMACEUTICAL CARE

KW - COMMUNITY PHARMACY

KW - ELDERLY-PATIENTS

KW - OLDER-PEOPLE

KW - CLINICAL PHARMACISTS

KW - MANAGEMENT REVIEWS

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 74

SP - 16

EP - 33

JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0306-5251

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 5585019