Publication

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study

Meijer, HJA., Batenburg, RHK., Raghoebar, GM. & Vissink, A., Jul-2004, In : Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 31, 7, p. 522-526 5 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Meijer, HJA., Batenburg, RHK., Raghoebar, GM., & Vissink, A. (2004). Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 31(7), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x

Author

Meijer, HJA ; Batenburg, RHK ; Raghoebar, GM ; Vissink, A. / Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants : a 5-year prospective study. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 522-526.

Harvard

Meijer, HJA, Batenburg, RHK, Raghoebar, GM & Vissink, A 2004, 'Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study', Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x

Standard

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants : a 5-year prospective study. / Meijer, HJA; Batenburg, RHK; Raghoebar, GM; Vissink, A.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 31, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 522-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Meijer HJA, Batenburg RHK, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2004 Jul;31(7):522-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x


BibTeX

@article{1016e3a484f045ba846def94575a83e6,
title = "Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate and the condition of the peri-implant tissues of the IMZ implant system (two-stage cylindertype), the Branemark implant system (two-stage screwtype) and the ITI implant system (one-stage screwtype) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 5-year follow-up period.Material and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of functional loading.Results: The five-year survival rate is 98.3% for the IMZ group, 98.3% for the Bra group and 100% for the ITI group. Mean scores on indices for plaque, calculus, gingiva and bleeding were very low at all evaluation periods. Mean marginal bone loss over a period of 5 years, was 1.4 mm for the IMZ group, 0.7 mm for the Bra group and 0.9 mm for the ITI group.Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After 5 years no clinically relevant and statistically significant radiographic changes had developed between the three implant systems.",
keywords = "edentulous, dental implants, mandible, overdenture, CLINICAL-TRIAL, ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS, EDENTULOUS JAWS, PART I, MULTICENTER",
author = "HJA Meijer and RHK Batenburg and GM Raghoebar and A Vissink",
year = "2004",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "522--526",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants

T2 - a 5-year prospective study

AU - Meijer, HJA

AU - Batenburg, RHK

AU - Raghoebar, GM

AU - Vissink, A

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate and the condition of the peri-implant tissues of the IMZ implant system (two-stage cylindertype), the Branemark implant system (two-stage screwtype) and the ITI implant system (one-stage screwtype) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 5-year follow-up period.Material and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of functional loading.Results: The five-year survival rate is 98.3% for the IMZ group, 98.3% for the Bra group and 100% for the ITI group. Mean scores on indices for plaque, calculus, gingiva and bleeding were very low at all evaluation periods. Mean marginal bone loss over a period of 5 years, was 1.4 mm for the IMZ group, 0.7 mm for the Bra group and 0.9 mm for the ITI group.Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After 5 years no clinically relevant and statistically significant radiographic changes had developed between the three implant systems.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate and the condition of the peri-implant tissues of the IMZ implant system (two-stage cylindertype), the Branemark implant system (two-stage screwtype) and the ITI implant system (one-stage screwtype) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 5-year follow-up period.Material and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of functional loading.Results: The five-year survival rate is 98.3% for the IMZ group, 98.3% for the Bra group and 100% for the ITI group. Mean scores on indices for plaque, calculus, gingiva and bleeding were very low at all evaluation periods. Mean marginal bone loss over a period of 5 years, was 1.4 mm for the IMZ group, 0.7 mm for the Bra group and 0.9 mm for the ITI group.Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After 5 years no clinically relevant and statistically significant radiographic changes had developed between the three implant systems.

KW - edentulous

KW - dental implants

KW - mandible

KW - overdenture

KW - CLINICAL-TRIAL

KW - ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS

KW - EDENTULOUS JAWS

KW - PART I

KW - MULTICENTER

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00510.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 522

EP - 526

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 4243544