Interventionism for the Intentional Stance: True Believers and Their Brains

Eronen, M. I., 2020, In : Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy. 39, p. 45-55 11 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Copy link to clipboard


  • Interventionism for the Intentional Stance

    Final publisher's version, 768 KB, PDF document


The relationship between psychological states and the brain remains an unresolved issue in philosophy of psychology. One appealing solution that has been influential both in science and in philosophy is Dennett’s concept of the intentional stance, according to which beliefs and desires are real and objective phenomena, but not necessarily states of the brain. A fundamental shortcoming of this approach is that it does not seem to leave any causal role for beliefs and desires in influencing behavior. In this paper, I show that intentional states ascribed from the intentional stance should be seen as real (interventionist) causes, develop this to an independently plausible ontological position, and present a response to the latest interventionist causal exclusion worries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-55
Number of pages11
JournalTopoi: An International Review of Philosophy
Early online date2-Dec-2017
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Dennett, Intentional stance, Interventionism, Mental causation, Real patterns

ID: 54323356