Publication

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale

Buer Christensen, T., Paap, M. C. S., Arnesen, M., Koritzinsky, K., Nysaeter, T-E., Eikenaes, I., Germans Selvik, S., Walther, K., Torgersen, S., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Kvarstein, E., Pedersen, G. & Hummelen, B., 2-Nov-2018, In : Journal of Personality Assessment. 100, 6, p. 630-641 12 p.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Buer Christensen, T., Paap, M. C. S., Arnesen, M., Koritzinsky, K., Nysaeter, T-E., Eikenaes, I., ... Hummelen, B. (2018). Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

Author

Buer Christensen, Tore ; Paap, Muirne C. S. ; Arnesen, Marianne ; Koritzinsky, Karoline ; Nysaeter, Tor-Erik ; Eikenaes, Ingeborg ; Germans Selvik, Sara ; Walther, Kristoffer ; Torgersen, Svenn ; Bender, Donna S. ; Skodol, Andrew E. ; Kvarstein, Elfrida ; Pedersen, Geir ; Hummelen, Benjamin. / Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I : Level of Personality Functioning Scale. In: Journal of Personality Assessment. 2018 ; Vol. 100, No. 6. pp. 630-641.

Harvard

Buer Christensen, T, Paap, MCS, Arnesen, M, Koritzinsky, K, Nysaeter, T-E, Eikenaes, I, Germans Selvik, S, Walther, K, Torgersen, S, Bender, DS, Skodol, AE, Kvarstein, E, Pedersen, G & Hummelen, B 2018, 'Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale', Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

Standard

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I : Level of Personality Functioning Scale. / Buer Christensen, Tore; Paap, Muirne C. S.; Arnesen, Marianne; Koritzinsky, Karoline; Nysaeter, Tor-Erik; Eikenaes, Ingeborg; Germans Selvik, Sara; Walther, Kristoffer; Torgersen, Svenn; Bender, Donna S.; Skodol, Andrew E.; Kvarstein, Elfrida; Pedersen, Geir; Hummelen, Benjamin.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 100, No. 6, 02.11.2018, p. 630-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Buer Christensen T, Paap MCS, Arnesen M, Koritzinsky K, Nysaeter T-E, Eikenaes I et al. Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2018 Nov 2;100(6):630-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377


BibTeX

@article{daba9b65dc944adf932dac1f2423fa10,
title = "Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale",
abstract = "The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.",
keywords = "personality disorder, UNITED-STATES, SELF-REPORT, PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION, EMPIRICAL SUPPORT, FIELD TRIALS, IRONIC FATE, PART I, PREVALENCE, CLASSIFICATION, SEVERITY",
author = "{Buer Christensen}, Tore and Paap, {Muirne C. S.} and Marianne Arnesen and Karoline Koritzinsky and Tor-Erik Nysaeter and Ingeborg Eikenaes and {Germans Selvik}, Sara and Kristoffer Walther and Svenn Torgersen and Bender, {Donna S.} and Skodol, {Andrew E.} and Elfrida Kvarstein and Geir Pedersen and Benjamin Hummelen",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "630--641",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I

T2 - Level of Personality Functioning Scale

AU - Buer Christensen, Tore

AU - Paap, Muirne C. S.

AU - Arnesen, Marianne

AU - Koritzinsky, Karoline

AU - Nysaeter, Tor-Erik

AU - Eikenaes, Ingeborg

AU - Germans Selvik, Sara

AU - Walther, Kristoffer

AU - Torgersen, Svenn

AU - Bender, Donna S.

AU - Skodol, Andrew E.

AU - Kvarstein, Elfrida

AU - Pedersen, Geir

AU - Hummelen, Benjamin

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

AB - The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

KW - personality disorder

KW - UNITED-STATES

KW - SELF-REPORT

KW - PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION

KW - EMPIRICAL SUPPORT

KW - FIELD TRIALS

KW - IRONIC FATE

KW - PART I

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - CLASSIFICATION

KW - SEVERITY

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 630

EP - 641

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 63983524