Publication

Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten

Bosch, M., Fokken, M. & van de Wal, R., Jul-2016, In : Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies. 19, 2, p. 205-223

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

APA

Bosch, M., Fokken, M., & van de Wal, R. (2016). Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 19(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC

Author

Bosch, Mineke ; Fokken, Margriet ; van de Wal, Rozemarijn. / Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten. In: Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 205-223.

Harvard

Bosch, M, Fokken, M & van de Wal, R 2016, 'Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten' Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 205-223. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC

Standard

Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten. / Bosch, Mineke; Fokken, Margriet; van de Wal, Rozemarijn.

In: Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 07.2016, p. 205-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Vancouver

Bosch M, Fokken M, van de Wal R. Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc? Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies. 2016 Jul;19(2):205-223. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC


BibTeX

@article{df021225a5e1496b8b9ed307f34b34d6,
title = "Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc?: Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten",
abstract = "In this article, we evaluate the integration of gender as a category of historical analysis within the curriculum of history programmes at seven Dutch universities. We do so as ‘integration’ was the term used by most of our informants to characterise the inclusion of gender in the curriculum. We understand integration to mean attention for gender in all courses or wherever appropriate, which – we suggest – does not exclude courses that specifically focus on gender history. Throughout the article, gender history is used in a broad sense as including ‘women’s history’. We have interviewed lecturers and students at the different universities and analysed their programme brochures for the year 2015-2016. Furthermore, we have studied how, in history theses for the year 2015, gender as a category of analysis is used. Many of the lecturers we spoke with stated firmly that ‘integration’ is aimed for at their university. But, how exactly is this idea of ‘integration’ understood and effected in practice? Is it a case of wishful thinking, a magic solution, or is it rather a disappearing act? We conclude that, while integration is a noble ambition, in order for this to be truly successful it is necessary to make such policies more explicit.",
author = "Mineke Bosch and Margriet Fokken and {van de Wal}, Rozemarijn",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC",
language = "Dutch",
volume = "19",
pages = "205--223",
journal = "Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies",
issn = "1388-3186",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integratie: Toverwoord of verdwijntruc?

T2 - Gender in het curriculum van opleidingen geschiedenis aan Nederlandse universiteiten

AU - Bosch, Mineke

AU - Fokken, Margriet

AU - van de Wal, Rozemarijn

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - In this article, we evaluate the integration of gender as a category of historical analysis within the curriculum of history programmes at seven Dutch universities. We do so as ‘integration’ was the term used by most of our informants to characterise the inclusion of gender in the curriculum. We understand integration to mean attention for gender in all courses or wherever appropriate, which – we suggest – does not exclude courses that specifically focus on gender history. Throughout the article, gender history is used in a broad sense as including ‘women’s history’. We have interviewed lecturers and students at the different universities and analysed their programme brochures for the year 2015-2016. Furthermore, we have studied how, in history theses for the year 2015, gender as a category of analysis is used. Many of the lecturers we spoke with stated firmly that ‘integration’ is aimed for at their university. But, how exactly is this idea of ‘integration’ understood and effected in practice? Is it a case of wishful thinking, a magic solution, or is it rather a disappearing act? We conclude that, while integration is a noble ambition, in order for this to be truly successful it is necessary to make such policies more explicit.

AB - In this article, we evaluate the integration of gender as a category of historical analysis within the curriculum of history programmes at seven Dutch universities. We do so as ‘integration’ was the term used by most of our informants to characterise the inclusion of gender in the curriculum. We understand integration to mean attention for gender in all courses or wherever appropriate, which – we suggest – does not exclude courses that specifically focus on gender history. Throughout the article, gender history is used in a broad sense as including ‘women’s history’. We have interviewed lecturers and students at the different universities and analysed their programme brochures for the year 2015-2016. Furthermore, we have studied how, in history theses for the year 2015, gender as a category of analysis is used. Many of the lecturers we spoke with stated firmly that ‘integration’ is aimed for at their university. But, how exactly is this idea of ‘integration’ understood and effected in practice? Is it a case of wishful thinking, a magic solution, or is it rather a disappearing act? We conclude that, while integration is a noble ambition, in order for this to be truly successful it is necessary to make such policies more explicit.

U2 - 10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC

DO - 10.5117/TVGN2016.2.BOSC

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 205

EP - 223

JO - Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies

JF - Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies

SN - 1388-3186

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 34208035