In-Store Spending Dynamics: How Budgets Invert Relative-Spending PatternsSheehan, D. & van Ittersum, K., Jun-2018, In : Journal of Consumer Research. 45, 1, p. 49-67 19 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
The authors conduct four controlled lab experiments and one field study in a brick-and-mortar grocery store to demonstrate that relative spending-the price of the purchased item relative to the mean price of the product category-evolves nonlinearly and distinctly for budget and nonbudget shoppers. While the relative spending of budget shoppers evolves in a concave manner, the relative spending of nonbudget shoppers evolves inversely in a convex manner. Thus, budget (nonbudget) shoppers spend relatively more (less) in the middle than at the beginning and toward the end of their shopping trip. Mediation analyses confirm that the pain of paying experienced while shopping drives price salience, which then drives relative spending. Moreover, manipulating shoppers' pain of paying, by altering the opportunity costs associated with their spending or drawing shoppers' attention to their spending via real-time spending feedback, is shown to influence these spending patterns. The research offers theoretical contributions to the in-store decision-making, budgeting, and pain-of-paying literature and has important implications for marketing and promotion strategies in retail and mobile technology environments, as it suggests when a shopper may be more sensitive to price-related factors.
|Number of pages||19|
|Journal||Journal of Consumer Research|
|Publication status||Published - Jun-2018|
- spending, budgets, pain of paying, price salience, spending feedback, in-store decision-making, shopper marketing, SELF-REGULATION FAILURE, SIMPLE MEDIATION MODELS, CONSUMER CHOICE, PURCHASE BEHAVIOR, CONJOINT-ANALYSIS, DECISION-MAKING, SHOPPERS, PAIN, CONSUMPTION, PROMOTIONS