Publication

Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of Achilles tendon ruptures: A systematic review

Dams, O. C., Reininga, I. H. F., Gielen, J. L., van den Akker-Scheek, I. & Zwerver, J. Nov-2017 In : Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured. 48, 11, p. 2383-2399 17 p.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewReview article

Copy link to clipboard

Documents

  • Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of Achilles tendon

    Final publisher's version, 1 MB, PDF-document

DOI

Objective: To determine the role of imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of the Achilles tendon rupture (ATR).

Study design: Systematic review.

Data sources: PubMed and EMBASE in November 2016.

Eligibility criteria: Clinical studies providing information on the methods and role of imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of the ATR were included.

Results: Fifty-six studies were included, most concerning the use of ultrasound (n = 37) or MRI (n = 18). Seven studies provided data on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging. Most ultrasound studies used a 7.5 MHz probe (19/32 studies) and scanned the patient bilaterally in prone position, with recent studies tending to use higher frequency probes (r = 0.42). Sensitivity [for detecting a rupture] ranged from 79.6 to 100%; the spread in specificity was large but two studies showed perfect (100%) data. Negative and positive likelihood ratios ranged from 0 to 0.23 and 1.0 to 10 respectively.

MRI examination was generally performed with 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI (6/12 studies) with a strong trend for higher T strength in more recent studies (r = 0.71). One study reported a sensitivity of 90.9% and one a specificity of 100%.

Although imaging can visualize structure and healing, these results were generally not related to the clinical picture. Overall, ultrasound was recommended over MRI for diagnosis and monitoring. Results of other imaging modalities remain inconclusive.

Conclusion: The adjunct role of imaging, especially of ultrasound and MRI, in the diagnosis and monitoring of ATRs was established. It is therefore recommended to rely primarily on the clinical examination and evaluation and to use imaging for ruling out other injuries and providing additional clinical information. More high-quality research is warranted into the diagnostic accuracy of imaging as well as less conventional imaging modalities' diagnostic and monitoring capabilities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2383-2399
Number of pages17
JournalInjury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured
Volume48
Issue number11
Early online date18-Sep-2017
StatePublished - Nov-2017

    Keywords

  • Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine, Traumatology, Orthopaedics, Ankle, Ultrasound, MRI, Diagnostics, Foot, Tendon injuries, Radiology, REAL-TIME SONOELASTOGRAPHY, SURGICAL REPAIR, INCREASING INCIDENCE, DYNAMIC ULTRASOUND, OPERATIVE REPAIR, ULTRASONOGRAPHY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, MANAGEMENT, SURGERY

View graph of relations

ID: 48443451