How Concrete Do We Get Telling Stories?Vossen, P., Caselli, T. & Cybulska, A., Jul-2018, In : Topics in Cognitive Science. 10, 3, p. 621-640 20 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Will reading different stories about the same event in the world result in a similar image of the world? Will reading the same story by different people result in a similar proxy for experiencing the story? The answer to both questions is no because language is abstract by definition and relies on our episodic experience to turn a story into a more concrete mental movie. Since our episodic knowledge differs, also the mental movie will be different. Language leaves out details, and this becomes specifically clear when building machines that read texts to represent events and to establish event relations across mentions, such as co‐reference, causality, subevents, scripts, timelines, and storylines. There is a lot of information and knowledge on the event that is not in the text but is needed to reconstruct these relations and understand the story. Machines lack this knowledge and experience and likewise make explicit what it takes to understand stories from text. In this paper, we report on experiments to automatically model event descriptions and instances across different news articles. We will show that event information is scattered over the text but also varies a lot in the degree it abstracts from details, which makes establishing event identity and relations extremely difficult. The variation in granularity of event descriptions seems to vary with pragmatic communicative strategies and defines the problem at different levels of complexity.
|Number of pages||20|
|Journal||Topics in Cognitive Science|
|Publication status||Published - Jul-2018|
- storylines, event extraction, COREFERENCE, EVENTS, ABSTRACTION
No data available